Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Magnetic character of the low-energy enhancement in <sup>70</sup>Zn.

Nature·2026
Same author

Beta-Decay Half-Lives beyond ^{54}Ca: A Systematic Survey of Decay Properties Approaching the Neutron Dripline.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Constraining the Synthesis of the Lightest p Nucleus ^{74}Se.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Physical Activity and Its Relationship With National-Based Examination Results Among Adolescents.

Journal of adolescence·2025
Same author

Enhanced production of <sup>60</sup>Fe in massive stars.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

First Study of the ^{139}Ba(n,γ)^{140}Ba Reaction to Constrain the Conditions for the Astrophysical i Process.

Physical review letters·2024

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

同級生による議論が,授業中のコンセプト質問における生徒のパフォーマンスを改善する理由

M K Smith1, W B Wood, W K Adams

  • 1Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. michelle.k.smith@colorado.edu

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|January 3, 2009
PubMed
まとめ

大学生の遺伝学コースでのピアディスカッションは,複雑な概念に対する学生の理解を大幅に高めます. この教育戦略は,単なる仲間からの影響ではなく,真の理解を促進することによって,学習結果を改善します.

さらに関連する動画

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

科学分野:

  • 遺伝学教育研究 遺伝学教育研究
  • 学士課程の科学教育学について
  • 学習における認知科学

背景:

  • クリッカーベースの質問応答は,ピアディスカッションの後によく改善されます.
  • この改善の理由 (理解の強化と仲間からの影響) は議論されている.
  • これらの要因を区別することは,効果的な教学戦略にとって極めて重要です.

研究 の 目的:

  • 同級生による議論が,大学生遺伝学における概念的理解を強化するかどうかを判断する.
  • 真の学習成果と,同級生との交流中の社会的影響の違いを区別する.
  • 適切な答えを最初から持っていない生徒が同級生による議論の影響を評価する.

主な方法:

  • 遺伝学の学士課程の学生は,クリッカーを使って個別に概念的な質問に答えました.
  • 個々の回答に続いて,生徒たちは同級生と質問について議論した.
  • 同じコンセプトに関する2つ目の同型質問は,学習成果を評価するために個別に管理されました.

主要な成果:

  • 正しい答えの割合は,ピアディスカッションとリボート後に増加した.
  • この改善は,ディスカッショングループの生徒が最初正しい答えを知らなかった場合でも持続しました.
  • 結果は,議論そのものがより深い理解を促したことを示唆しています.

結論:

  • ピアディスカッションは,遺伝学の概念的理解を高めるための効果的な教育ツールです.
  • ピア・ディスカッションの利点は,単なるピア・インパクトを超えて,真の学習を促進します.
  • この戦略は,グループ内の初期知識が低い状況でも有用です.