Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

Overview
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

Overview
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Careless responding detection revisited: Accuracy of direct and indirect measures.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Normality assumption in latent interaction models.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

Combating COVID-19 with charisma: Evidence on governor speeches in the United States.

The leadership quarterly·2023
Same author

COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

The American psychologist·2020
Same author

Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist.

Nature human behaviour·2019
Same author

A consensus-based transparency checklist.

Nature human behaviour·2019

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

選挙を予測する:子供の遊び!

John Antonakis1, Olaf Dalgas

  • 1Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. john.antonakis@unil.ch

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|March 3, 2009
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

子供も大人も,候補者の顔を見て,選挙結果を予測することができます. この2つの年齢層は,

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

科学分野:

  • 心理学,政治学,行動経済学

背景:

  • 顔の表情は,有権者の認識と選挙結果に影響を与えます.
  • 以前の研究は,主に成人の有権者の認識に焦点を当てていた.

研究 の 目的:

  • 子どもの顔の好みが選挙結果を予測できるかどうかを調査する.
  • 選挙結果における子供と大人の予測精度を比較する.

主な方法:

  • 子どもと大人が候補者の顔を評価する2つの実験が行われました.
  • 大人は,認知された能力に基づいて顔を評価しました.
  • 子どもたちは,仮説的な役 (船長) を好むことに基づいて,顔の評価をした.

主要な成果:

  • 子供と大人の両者の顔面の好みは,実際の選挙結果と相関していました.
  • 予測の精度は,両方の年齢層で一貫していました.

結論:

  • 顔の外見は,異なる年齢層における政治的認識に役割を果たします.
  • 投票行動に影響を与える顔の特徴を推論する能力は,人生の初期に発達する可能性があります.