関連する実験動画
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

10:07
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
医学教育における実験. 伝統的な基準を用いた批判的分析
L J Goodman1, E E Brueschke, R C Bone
1Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill 60612.
JAMA
|May 8, 1991
まとめ
ラッシュ・メディカル・カレッジ
科学分野:
- 医療教育 医療教育について
- カリキュラム開発・カリキュラム開発
- ペダゴジック・ペダゴジック
背景:
- ラッシュ・メディカル・カレッジは,伝統的なプログラムに加えて,ソクラテスの問題ベースの方法を用いた代替カリキュラムを導入しました.
- この研究は,この新しい教学アプローチの有効性を評価することを目的とした.
研究 の 目的:
- 伝統的なカリキュラムと代替カリキュラムの学生の成績を比較する.
- 試験の結果を評価するために,National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) の試験と口頭試験を使用します.
主な方法:
- 学生の成績データを比較分析する.
- NBME Part I および Part II の合計およびサブセットスコアを使用した.
- 口頭試験での評価された成績.
主要な成果:
- カリキュラム間のNBME Part IとPart IIの全体的なスコアには大きな違いはありません.
- 代替カリキュラムの生徒は,初期の年にNBME Part Iでより低いサブセットスコアを示しました.
- 代替カリキュラムの学生は,後のコホートで口頭試験で高得点を達成しました.
結論:
- 代替カリキュラムは,標準化されたテストで従来のカリキュラムと比較可能な全体的なパフォーマンスを示しました.
- ソクラテスの問題ベースの方法は,口頭試験のパフォーマンスを改善する可能性を示しました.
- カリキュラムのデザインは,評価の種類によって,生徒の成績に異なる影響を及ぼします.
さらに関連する動画
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
関連する概念動画
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Data Collection by Experiments
Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public clinical trial...
An example of the experimental method is a public clinical trial...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
What is an Experiment?
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Cochran's Q Test
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...