脱走者の協調的な処罰は協力関係を維持し,稀な場合には増殖することがあります
Robert Boyd1, Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles
1Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA. rboyd@anthro.ucla.edu
まとめ
グループメンバーがフリーライダーを一緒に罰する調整された罰は,進化し,全体のグループ報酬を増やすことができます. これは,協調されていない罰とは対照的であり,多くの場合,費用がかかりすぎて,協力が生まれないか,協力のために有益である.
科学分野:
- 進化的ゲーム理論とは
- 社会的行動 社会的行動
- 人間協力 人間協力.
背景:
- 協力は不可欠ですが,フリーライダーによって失敗することがあります.
- 現存するモデルでは,高価な刑罰の進化を説明するのに苦労しています.
- 調整されていない罰は,想定よりも効果が低く,コストが高くなる可能性があります.
研究 の 目的:
- 人類の祖先の条件下で,調整された刑罰の進化をモデル化するために.
- グループサイズによって処罰コストの減少が協力にどのように影響するか調査する.
- 調整された罰がグループ平均の報酬を高めることができるかどうかを判断する.
主な方法:
- 協調的な刑罰の数学モデルを開発した.
- モデルを祖先のグループサイズと条件に合わせた.
- めったにない時における刑罰の拡大の条件を分析した.
主要な成果:
- 調整された罰は,稀な場合でも増える可能性があります.
- フリーライダーを罰するコストは,参加者が増えるにつれて減少します.
- 調整された罰は,グループ平均の報酬の増加につながります.
結論:
- 調整された罰は,罰の出現のための実行可能な進化の経路を提供します.
- このモデルは,刑罰のコストと有効性に関する以前のモデルとの問題を解決します.
- 調整された処罰は,協調されていないアプローチとは異なり,協力性と集団の利益を高めます.
関連する概念動画
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome. Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome. Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.


