生物学における因果関係再考:メイアの近接・究極の二分法はまだ有用ですか?
Kevin N Laland1, Kim Sterelny, John Odling-Smee
1School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9TS, UK. knl1@st-andrews.ac.uk
まとめ
エルンスト・メイアーの50年前の近接と究極の因果関係のモデルは,生物学において依然として影響力を発揮しています. この枠組みは進化論を安定させながらも,重要な生物学の分野における科学的進歩を阻害するかもしれない.
科学分野:
- 生物学 生物学 生物学とは
- 進化生物学の進化生物学について
- 科学の哲学 科学の哲学
背景:
- エルンスト・メイヤーの1974年の論文は,生物学における近接 (即時) と究極 (進化) の原因の区別を導入した.
- Mayrは,これらの因果的レベルは異なる問題に対処し,相互排他的ではないと主張し,この見解は広く受け入れられている.
- この二重因果関係モデルは,50年間,生物学的研究と理論を深く形作ってきた.
関連する概念動画
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Correlation and Causation
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...


