Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Cerebral Hemispheres01:05

Cerebral Hemispheres

The human brain, a complex organ, is functionally divided into two cerebral hemispheres—left and right. These hemispheres are interconnected by a structure of paramount importance, the corpus callosum. This substantial bundle of neural fibers is not just a bridge between the hemispheres but a crucial element for the brain's comprehensive functioning. It enables efficient communication between the two hemispheres, allowing each side of the brain to control and receive sensory and motor...
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Confidence judgments, feelings of knowing and judgments of learning: Towards a common framework.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Subjective Confidence as a Monitor of the Replicability of the Response.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2024
Same author

Subjective Confidence in the Response to Personality Questions: Some Insight Into the Construction of People's Responses to Test Items.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

When reality is out of focus: Can people tell whether their beliefs and judgments are correct or wrong?

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2018
Same author

The Prototypical Majority Effect Under Social Influence.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2018
Same author

Agency attributions of mental effort during self-regulated learning.

Memory & cognition·2017

関連する実験動画

Updated: May 23, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
08:29

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans

Published on: December 18, 2016

2つの頭が1つより優れているのはいつですか?なぜですか?

Asher Koriat1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. akoriat@research.haifa.ac.il

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|April 21, 2012
PubMed
まとめ

2つの頭は1つより優れているが,コミュニケーションを取っている場合に限る. グループの中でより自信のある個人に頼ることは,ほとんどの人が間違っているときに,より悪い決定につながる可能性があります.

科学分野:

  • 認知心理学とは,認知心理学である.
  • 社会心理学 社会心理学とは
  • 意思決定科学は意思決定科学である.

背景:

  • 集団の意思決定は,しばしば個人の判断を上回ります.
  • 自由なコミュニケーションと共有された信頼は,グループの有効性の重要な要因です.
  • 主観的な自信は,判断の正確さを理解する上で重要な要素です.

研究 の 目的:

  • グループ意思決定の利点が直接の相互作用なしに複製できるかどうかを調査する.
  • 個人の精度とグループの精度における主観的な自信の役割を調べる.
  • 集団の決定が個々の決定より優れている条件を決定する.

主な方法:

  • 感知的なタスクを使用して",2つの頭は1つよりも良い"の研究の複製.
  • 直接的なコミュニケーションを取り除くために,仮想ダイアードが採用されました.
  • 各試験について,より自信のあるメンバーの決定の選択.
  • 信頼度およびエラー率に基づいて意思決定の正確性の分析.

主要な成果:

  • より自信のあるメンバーに頼ることで",二人の頭は一人の頭より優れている"という効果が再現されました.

さらに関連する動画

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
08:29

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans

Published on: December 18, 2016

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

  • 多数決が間違っていた場合,より自信のあるメンバーの決定は,最良の個人決定よりも劣った結果をもたらしました.
  • 主観的な自信はコンセンサスと相関しているが,必ずしも正確さとは関係がない.
  • 結論:

    • グループ意思決定の利点は,直接的なコミュニケーションにのみ依存するものではありません.
    • "より自信のあるメンバー"のヒューリスティックは,コンセンサスが広範なエラーに基づいている場合に有害である可能性があります.
    • 信頼,コンセンサス,および正確性の関係を理解することは,グループのパフォーマンスを最適化するために不可欠です.