ディアリアミンのロジカルを捕まえる抗酸化物質の触媒メカニズム
Evan A Haidasz1, Ron Shah, Derek A Pratt
1Department of Chemistry, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|October 31, 2014
まとめ
ディアリアミンの抗酸化物質は,複数のラジカルを捕まえて高温で効果的です. 彼らの再生メカニズムは,基板とダイアリアミン構造に依存し,全体的な効率に影響を与えます.
科学分野:
- 工業化学 工業化学について
- 有機化学 オーガニック・ケミストリー
- マテリアルサイエンス 材料科学
背景:
- ディアリアミンの抗酸化物質は,特に石油製品における重要な工業添加物であり,その高温のラジカル捕捉能力が重要です.
- その有効性は,単一のダイアリアミン分子が複数のラジカルを捕まえる能力から生じ,再生サイクルを示唆しています.
研究 の 目的:
- ダイアライアミン抗酸化物質の高温の激素捕捉活動に起因するメカニズムを解明する.
- 抗酸化過程で形成される中間アルコキシアミンの分解経路を調査する.
- 分解機構とダイアリアミンの全体的な触媒効率を相関させるため.
主な方法:
- 反応経路をモデル化するための計算研究.
- アルコキシアミンの分解に関する実験的調査.
- 高温 (160 °C) でヘクサデカンを用いたオート酸化阻害アッセイ.
主要な成果:
- ディアリラミン系アルコキシアミンの分解は,2つの異なるメカニズムによって発生します:N-Oホモリシス/不均衡化または協調されたレトロ-カルボニル-エネ反応です.
- このメカニズムは,基板とダイアリアミンの両方の特定の構造に依存しています.
- レトロカルボニルエネ経路で分解するアルコキシアミンは,N-O同分解で分解するアルコキシアミンと比較して,ヘクサデカンの自己酸化を優しく抑制することが示された.
結論:
- ディアリアミンの抗酸化物質の触媒効率は基質に依存し,アルコキシアミンの分解経路の影響を受けます.
- レトロカルボニルエネ反応経路は,ダイアリラミンのより効果的な再生につながります.
- レトロカルボニルエネ反応を好むダイアリアミンの設計は,より低温で触媒活性を改善したより強力な抗酸化添加物の開発に有望な戦略を提供します.
関連する概念動画
Radical Autoxidation
2.5K
The oxidation of an organic compound in the presence of air or oxygen is called autoxidation. For example, cumene reacts with oxygen to form hydroperoxide. Autoxidation involves initiation, propagation, and termination steps. Many organic compounds are susceptible to autoxidation—especially ethers in the presence of oxygen, which form hydroperoxides. Even though this reaction is slow, old ether bottles contain small amounts of peroxide, which leads to laboratory explosions during ether...
2.5K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
1.7K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
1.7K
Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular
1.4K
Radical reactions can occur either intermolecularly or intramolecularly. In an intermolecular radical reaction, a nucleophilic radical adds to an electrophilic alkene or vice versa. In such reactions, the radical and generally the alkene, which is also called the radical trap, are two different molecules. Additionally, for such intermolecular reactions to occur, the radical trap must be active, present in an excess concentration, and the radical starting material must have a weak...
1.4K
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
1.6K
The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic...
Along with electronic...
1.6K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.1K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.1K
Radical Formation: Elimination
1.6K
Another method of radical formation is the elimination process. It is the opposite of the addition route and is driven by the instability of the radical. For example, as depicted in Figure 1, dibenzoyl peroxide yields a pair of unstable radicals upon homolysis. Given its instability, this radical spontaneously undergoes elimination via a C–C bond cleavage to form a relatively more stable phenyl radical. The mechanism involves cleavage of the bond between the α and β positions...
1.6K


