回転する共振器の上に飛ぶ結合器は,不可逆的な屈折を生成する
Shai Maayani1, Raphael Dahan1, Yuri Kligerman1
1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Nature
|June 29, 2018
まとめ
研究者らは,回転共鳴器とフライングフォトニックカップラーを使用して,ハードドライブ技術にインスパイアされた新しい光学分離器を開発しました これにより,電気通信および量子アプリケーションの高光隔離 (99.6%) が達成されます.
科学分野:
- 光学について
- オプトメカニクス
- ナノテクノロジー
背景:
- 光学分離器は多くの用途に不可欠であり,非互換的な光の伝播を可能にします.
- 以前の光学分離方法は 高回転率とナノメートルの精度で困難に直面しました
- ハードディスクの磁気読み取りヘッドの空気力学的な浮揚からインスピレーションを得ました
研究 の 目的:
- 高性能の新型光学分離器を設計する
- 既存の光学分離技術の限界を克服する.
- 回転光学コンポーネントを使用して不可逆的な光の伝送を証明する.
主な方法:
- 球形共鳴器の上を飛ぶ光子結合器 (線形繊維) の製造
- 結合器と共振器をナノメートルのスケールで分離するための空気力学原理を用いる.
- 反循環光学モードを分割するために,共振器の高速回転を達成します.
主要な成果:
- 標準的な通信ファイバーで99.6%の光隔離を提供する装置を実証した.
- 結合器を片側から透明にし,もう片側から不透明にする.
- 繊維と球体の凸な幾何学は,ナノメートルスケールの分離を可能にします.
結論:
- 開発された光学分離器は,非互換的な光伝達において重要な進歩をもたらします.
- この技術は,光ファイバーベースの量子相互接続に潜在的に応用できます.
- この新しいアプローチは 将来の表面科学の研究を ナノメートルのスケールでの分離で可能にします
関連する概念動画
Reversible and Irreversible Processes
5.8K
The thermodynamic processes can be classified into reversible and irreversible processes. The processes that can be restored to their initial state are called reversible processes. It is only possible if the process is in quasi-static equilibrium, i.e., it takes place in infinitesimally small steps, and the system remains at equilibrium However, these are ideal processes and do not occur naturally. An ideal system undergoing a reversible process is always in thermodynamic equilibrium within...
5.8K
Resonance
65.7K
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N-O and N=O bonds.
65.7K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K


