Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.3K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.3K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.3K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

832
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
832
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.8K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.5K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.5K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.7K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.7K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Why controlling for habitat amount is critical for resolving the fragmentation debate.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Local signals, systemic decline.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

The mechanics of liver regeneration.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Computing in a memory with physics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Retraction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Making time.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.2K

学問の自由が脅かされている

Jonathan R Cole1

  • 1Jonathan R. Cole is the John Mitchell Mason University Professor at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, where he was also the Provost and Dean of Faculties from 1989 to 2003.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|December 9, 2021
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

学問の自由は 権威主義と反知識主義の 脅威に直面しています これらの課題を克服するには,世界中のオープンな調査と学術的な独立性を擁護する必要があります.

さらに関連する動画

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.2K
Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.2K

科学分野:

  • 政治科学
  • 社会学
  • 高等教育研究

背景:

  • 学問の自由は前例のない グローバルな課題に直面しています
  • 香港のような 権威主義的な政権は オープンな議論を抑圧し 学者たちを追い出しています
  • アメリカでは反知識主義と 自由な探求に対する攻撃が 増えているのが明らかです

研究 の 目的:

  • 世界的に学問の自由に対する多面的な脅威を分析する.
  • オープンな調査を妨げる 主要なアクターと力を特定する
  • 学問の自由を守る緊急性を強調するためです

主な方法:

  • この研究は,現在の出来事と学術的議論に基づいた概念的分析です.
  • 国際的な報道,ニュースメディア,学術的な文献から情報を集約します.
  • 高等教育に影響を与える政治的・社会的傾向の質的評価

主要な成果:

  • 学問の自由は政府と非政府の両方から重大な脅威にさらされています.
  • これらの脅威は 政治的な干渉,検閲,反知的感情で表れています
  • 学問の自由の侵食は様々な政治的・イデオロギー的なスペクトルで観察されています.

結論:

  • 学問の自由の擁護には 強力な多様な勢力に対する 協調的な努力が必要です
  • 民主主義と知的進歩の健康には オープンな調査の保護が不可欠です
  • 世界的に学問の自由が 減少している状況に 対抗するには 緊急の対策が必要です