ブレイク・イブンを超えたリアルタイム量子エラー修正
V V Sivak1,2,3,4, A Eickbusch5,6,7, B Royer5,6,7,8,9
1Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. vladsivak@google.com.
Nature
|March 23, 2023
まとめ
研究者は量子コヘレンスを拡張する 安定した論理量子ビットを実証し 量子コンピューティングにおける 脱コヘレンスの課題を克服しました この突破は量子エラー補正 (QEC) 能力を大幅に改善します
科学分野:
- 量子情報科学
- 量子コンピューティング
- 量子エラー 修正
背景:
- 量子計算は量子コヘランスを維持することに 依存しています これは基本的にデコヘランスによって 挑戦されています
- 量子エラー補正 (QEC) は,協働プロセスを使用して,エラーが蓄積するより早くエラーを排除することを目的としています.
- これまでのQEC実験では過度の誤差が生み出され,実用化が困難でした.
研究 の 目的:
- 量子一貫性を拡張するための実用的な量子エラー修正 (QEC) 方法を実験的に実証する.
- 個々の量子コンポーネントよりも長い量子コヒーレンス時間を可能にするかどうかを判断する.
主な方法:
- 完全に安定した論理量子ビットシステムの開発
- 超伝導量子回路製造の革新を統合する
- プロセス最適化のためのモデルフリー強化学習の適用
主要な成果:
- 構成要素よりもはるかに長い量子コヒーレンスを持つ 論理量子ビットを示した.
- 個々の量子ビットの性能を上回る G = 2.27 ± 0.07 のコヒーレンス・ゲインを達成しました.
- 前回の実験の限界を乗り越えて 論理量子ビットを安定させ 誤りを修正しました
結論:
- 量子コヘランスを拡張するために QEC を利用することは事実上可能である.
- 証明されたQECアプローチは,論理量子ビットの安定性とコヒーレンス時間を大幅に改善します.
- この研究は より堅牢でスケーラブルな量子コンピュータの 基礎をなしています
関連する概念動画
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
751
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
751
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
571
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
571
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
747
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
747
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
6.3K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
1.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.8K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom
42.6K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
42.6K


