ダイレクトダイナミクスの軌跡は,Fe-Oxo-Mediated C-H機能化反応中のダイナミックマッチングと非統計的ラジカルペア中間を証明する
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|March 23, 2023
まとめ
非ヘムフェオキソ複合体は,水素原子移転 (HAT) によるC−H結合と反応する. 新しいダイナミクスは,反応の選択性は,単に中間物質ではなく,ダイナミックな効果によって駆動され,C-H機能化の新しいモデルを提供することを明らかにします.
科学分野:
- 有機金属化学
- 反応ダイナミクス
- コンピュータ化学
背景:
- 非ヘムフェオキソ複合体の反応は,アルカンC−H結合により,通常,水素原子移転 (HAT) と中間基対を伴う.
- HAT後の経路には,全体的な反応選択性に影響を与える,ラジカルリバウンド,解離,または不飽和が含まれます.
- これらの中間物質のダイナミクスを理解することは,C-H機能化を制御するために不可欠です.
研究 の 目的:
- アルカンC−H結合による非ヘムFe−オクソ複合体のポスト水素原子移転 (HAT) 反応ダイナミクスを調査する.
- 反応経路の選択性を決定する際のダイナミックな効果と中間構造の役割を明らかにする.
- 非ヘム Fe-オクソ媒介C-H機能化を理解するための新しいモデルを開発する.
主な方法:
- 密度関数理論 (DFT) に基づく準古典的直動的軌道を採用した.
- この研究は,HATステップの後の動態を調査することに焦点を当てました.
- リバウンド,解離,その他の経路を決定する軌道の結果の分析.
主要な成果:
- ラジカルペアの中間は非統計的であり,完全な内部振動再分配がない.
- 反応の選択性は,単に中間構造ではなく,主としてダイナミックな効果によって支配される.
- 急速なリバウンドは,Fe-OH結合の回転とアルカン基質の衝突のダイナミックなマッチングを通じて,明確な基質ペアの中間をバイパスします.
結論:
- ダイナミックな効果,特に非同期的な協調プロセスは,C-H機能化の選択性において重要な役割を果たします.
- ラジカルペアの中間物質は一時的であり,その構造が反応結果を完全に決定するわけではない.
- この研究は,非ヘム Fe-oxo-mediated C-H 機能化の選択性を理解するための新しい視点とモデルを提供します.
関連する概念動画
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.1K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.1K
Radical Reactivity: Intramolecular vs Intermolecular
1.8K
Radical reactions can occur either intermolecularly or intramolecularly. In an intermolecular radical reaction, a nucleophilic radical adds to an electrophilic alkene or vice versa. In such reactions, the radical and generally the alkene, which is also called the radical trap, are two different molecules. Additionally, for such intermolecular reactions to occur, the radical trap must be active, present in an excess concentration, and the radical starting material must have a weak...
1.8K
Radical Formation: Overview
2.1K
A bond can be broken either by heterolytic bond cleavage to form ions or homolytic bond cleavage to yield radicals. A fishhook arrow is used to represent the motion of a single electron in homolytic bond cleavage. There are two main sources from which radicals can be formed:
Radicals from spin-paired molecules:
Radicals can be obtained from spin-paired molecules either by homolysis or electron transfer. While two radicals are formed in the former, an electron is added in the...
Radicals from spin-paired molecules:
Radicals can be obtained from spin-paired molecules either by homolysis or electron transfer. While two radicals are formed in the former, an electron is added in the...
2.1K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
2.2K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.2K
Radical Formation: Addition
1.7K
Radicals can be formed by adding a radical to a spin-paired molecule. This is typically observed with unsaturated species, where the addition of a radical across the π bond leads to the production of a new radical by dissolving the π bond. For example, the addition of a Br radical to an alkene yields a carbon-centered radical.
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
1.7K
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
1.9K
The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic...
Along with electronic...
1.9K


