Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ

関連する概念動画

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

279
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
279
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

12.2K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
12.2K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

2.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
2.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Hyaluronic acid targeted and pH-responsive nanocarriers based on hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for chemo-photodynamic combination therapy.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2020
Same author

Tumor phase recognition using cone-beam computed tomography projections and external surrogate information.

Medical physics·2020
Same author

Realization of a time-correlated photon counting technique for fluorescence analysis.

Biomedical optics express·2020
Same author

Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Lipomatosis of Nerve: A Review of Ultrasonographic Finding for 8 Cases.

World neurosurgery·2020
Same author

Is dietary fat associated with the risk of age-related macular degeneration? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine·2020
Same author

Comparing the Prevalence of Poor Sleep and Stress Metrics in Basic versus Advanced Life Support Emergency Medical Services Personnel.

Prehospital emergency care·2020
Same journal

Validation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Systems in Respiratory Gating Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Emerging Outcome Trends From Proton Therapy for Pediatric CNS Tumors: A Systematic Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Biologically Effective Dose-Optimized Multi-Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy: A Biologically Comparable Alternative to Proton Arc Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Characterization of a Low-Energy Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam for Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Phenomenological Study of Intra-Spill Break Spots in Dose-Driven Continuous Scanning Proton Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
関連記事をすべて見る
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

IMPT の最悪の場合の頑丈性評価方法: 重要な比較

Chunbo Liu1,2, Chris J Beltran2, Jiajian Shen3

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

International journal of particle therapy
|August 20, 2025
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

濃度調節型陽子療法 (IMPT) の強度評価は,安全な投与のために極めて重要です. この研究では,効果的な臨床IMPT計画の評価のために,DVH帯とヴォクセルによる最悪のケース分析を用いた組み合わせられたアプローチを推奨した.

キーワード:
濃度調節プロトン療法堅固さの評価最悪の場合のアプローチ

さらに関連する動画

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

科学分野:

  • 医学物理学
  • 放射線腫瘍学
  • 放射線治療の計画

背景:

  • 濃度調節プロトン療法 (IMPT) の臨床実践において,精度の高い投与量を確保するために,強度評価は不可欠である.
  • その重要性にもかかわらず,IMPTプランの堅実性評価の最適な方法に関するコンセンサスは欠けている.
  • この研究では,臨床的意思決定に役立つ 最悪のケースのアプローチの様々な方法が調査されています.

研究 の 目的:

  • 濃度調節型陽子療法 (IMPT) 計画における異なる強度評価方法の有効性を比較する.
  • 実践的で臨床的に適用可能な IMPT 計画評価戦略の選択に関する洞察を提供すること.
  • 様々な強度評価技術の相関性と能力を特定する.

主な方法:

  • 20の臨床IMPT計画 (10の前立腺,10の頭頸部) で5つの強度評価方法を評価した.
  • 方法には,エラーバー用量分布 (ebDD),ルート・メア・スクエア・エラー用量分布 (RMSED),ヴォクセルによる最悪のケース,物理シナリオの最悪のケース,および用量-体積ヒストグラム (DVH) の帯が含まれています.
  • 方法間の相関を分析し,投与誤差を検出するための定量/質の能力を評価した.

主要な成果:

  • ebDDとRMSEDと,ヴォクセルによる最悪シナリオと物理的な最悪シナリオの間で強い相関が観察されました.
  • DVH帯は,基準に対する用量変動の明確な概要を提供しているが,空間的な局所化は欠けている.
  • 最悪のケースは,用量分布内の特定の懸念事項を特定することに優れています.
  • 最悪の場合の物理シナリオは問題領域を特定しますが,複数の地域/メトリクスのために手ごわいかもしれません.

結論:

  • IMPTプランの評価には,異なる強度評価方法によって,独特で貴重な情報が得られます.
  • 物理的不確実性シナリオからのDVH帯を基準のチェックに使用する.
  • DVH帯が潜在的な問題を示すときに,リスクを空間的に局限化するために,最悪の場合の分析を使用します.