デジタル・コレクティブ・ラーニングは 参加者が増えれば 改善されますか? 共同学習プラットフォームの実験
Santos Orejudo1, Oscar Casanova1, Jacobo Cano-Escoriaza1
1Department of Educational Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Frontiers in psychology
|August 21, 2025
まとめ
この研究はオンライン学習における 集団知能を調査したものです 協力的なプラットフォームで より大きな学生グループが 感情的な能力に関する課題で より良い結果を得ました
科学分野:
- 教育技術
- オンライン学習環境
- コレクティブインテリジェンス
背景:
- インターネットは教育に変革をもたらし 仮想のコラボレーション空間を可能にしました
- コレクティブ・インテリジェンス原則は 段階的な問題解決とコンセンサスの構築のための 新しい共同学習プラットフォームを導くものです
研究 の 目的:
- 協力的な学習プラットフォームの効果を 異なるグループサイズで比較する
- 感情的な能力に関連するオンライン学習の課題における生徒の成績に グループサイズが与える影響を調査する.
主な方法:
- 11歳から12歳の生徒の3つのグループ (274,56,69人の参加者) は共同プラットフォームを使用しました.
- 学生たちは7段階の課題で 感情的な能力に関する5つの質問を ソーシャルネットワークでの社会的比較のケーススタディを使って 完了しました
主要な成果:
- 最大のグループ (274人の参加者) は,より小さなグループと比較して,著しく良い結果を達成しました.
- 統計的に有意な差異が観察されました.
結論:
- このコラボレーションプラットフォームの グループサイズが大きい場合,オンライン環境での学習成果が向上する可能性があります.
- プラットフォームの柔軟なデザインは,大規模な参加をサポートし,教育課題の集合的インテリジェンスを促進します.
関連する概念動画
Social Loafing
35.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.9K
Sample Size Calculation
3.8K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
3.8K
Bystander Effect
9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.2K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.2K
Group Polarization
35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
Social Facilitation
32.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.9K


