副作用の場合には,理屈が意図的帰属にどのように影響するのでしょうか
Nicola Matteucci Armandi Avogli Trotti1, Micaela Maria Zucchelli2, Andrea Pavan2
1Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, V.le Berti Pichat, 5, Bologna, Bo, 40127, Italy. nicola.matteucci4@unibo.it.
Cognitive processing
|August 21, 2025
まとめ
慎重な推論とより長い応答時間は,意図的判断のバイアスを軽減します,特に否定的な副作用のために. この研究は 行動とその結果に関する道徳的判断に 認知プロセスがどのように影響するかを明らかにしています
科学分野:
- 認知心理学
- 道徳 心理学
- 社会的認知
背景:
- 行動の客観的な評価には 心理状態と結果の統合が必要です
- 意図的という認識は 行動の結果によって歪められます
- ノーブ効果は,ネガティブな副作用よりも意図的な影響が大きいことを示しています.
研究 の 目的:
- 推論のスタイルと能力が意図的判断にどのように影響するかを調査する.
- ノーブ効果の背後にあるメカニズムを理解するために
- 道徳的な判断に 認知的要因がどう影響するかを調べる
主な方法:
- 172人の大学生が ランダム化された試験に参加しました
- 参加者は推論スタイルアンケート (REI,AOT) とシロジスティック推論のタスクを記入しました.
- シナリオベースのタスクは ネガティブな副作用や ポジティブな副作用をもたらしました
主要な成果:
- より慎重な推論スタイルは意図的帰属のバイアスを軽減しました.
- 反応時間の長さはバイアスの減少と関連した.
- 判断のバイアスに対する推論のスタイルに影響を及ぼした.
結論:
- 審議的な推論と処理時間の増加はノーブ効果を緩和します.
- 認知スタイルと応答の遅延は 道徳的判断において重要な役割を果たします
- 行動者の意図と結果についてよりバランスの取れた考え方を提案しています.
関連する概念動画
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
13.2K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.2K
00:56Attribution Theory
13.4K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.4K
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
635
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
635
01:37Reason and Intuition
6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
01:54The Placebo Effect
6.3K
The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.
6.3K
01:27Effects of Chemicals: Overview
1.4K
Drugs, encompassing various chemical compounds from natural sources, lab synthesis, or genetic engineering, elicit different biological responses in living organisms. Some of these responses are desirable or therapeutic, while others are undesirable. The primary goal of administering a drug is to achieve a therapeutic effect, that is, to address a specific disease or health condition. Any concurrent effects outside of this therapeutic outcome are considered undesirable. These undesirable...
1.4K