Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

965
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
965
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

79.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
79.5K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

33.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
33.8K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.5K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

201
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
201

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Internal electric fields enable piezocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production in BiOCl/carbon nitride oligomer heterostructures.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

LMOD+: A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset and Benchmark for Developing and Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Ophthalmology.

ACM transactions on computing for healthcare·2026
Same authorSame journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Nothing to see here: The weak evidence base for unconscious control of human behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Memorization in large language models in medicine prevalence characteristics and implications.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

The lifespan and healthspan extending effects of ellagic acid in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> require an intact insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway.

Frontiers in aging·2026

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K

学習能力とモニタリングの精度との間の負の関係

Mengqi Hu1, Wenbo Zhao2, Anran Li1

  • 1Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University.

Psychological science
|August 22, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

効果的な学習には 監視の精度が必要です 驚くべきことに 優れた学習能力は 監視の精度が低いことと相関し 優れた学習者は 常に優れた監視者であるという考えに 異議を唱えます

キーワード:
専門家の信頼不足学習の判断学習能力メタ解析監視の精度

さらに関連する動画

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

15.9K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

15.9K

科学分野:

  • 認知心理学
  • 教育心理学
  • メタコग्निション

背景:

  • 効果的な学習には,知識の獲得と正確な自己モニタリングの両方が必要です.
  • 学習能力と学習のモニタリングの精度 (メタ認知精度) の関係が完全に理解されていません.

研究 の 目的:

  • 個人の学習能力と学習の進捗状況を 監視する精度との関係を調査する.
  • 優れた学習者が 学習の監視に本質的に優れているという仮定に 異議を唱えるためです

主な方法:

  • 既存のデータ (N = 2,406) のメタ解析が行われました.
  • 熟練した学習者に対する信頼の欠如を検証するために,メタ分析データを再分析する.
  • 2つの制御実験 (N = 102とN = 481) を実施し,概念的に結果を再現した.

主要な成果:

  • 学習能力が高い個人は,モニタリングの精度がわずかに低いことが判明しました.
  • 熟練した学習者は 自信の欠如を示し 予想以上に多くのことを覚えています
  • 実験的研究によりメタ解析の結果が確認され,専門家学習者におけるモニタリングの欠陥が示されました.

結論:

  • 優れた学習者は 優れた監視者でもあるという 常識的な考え方は 疑問視されています
  • 専門的な学習者は,特に記憶の予測に自信が不足している状態で,モニタリングの欠陥を持っているかもしれません.
  • これは,学習能力とメタコグニティブモニタリングの精度との間の潜在的な分離を示唆しています.