プロテイン-リガンド結合親和性の予測のための二チャンネル階層的インタラクティブラーニング
Zheyu Wu1, Huifang Ma1, Bin Deng1
1College of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730070, China.
まとめ
新しいダブルチャネル・ヒエラルキカル・インタラクティブ・ラーニング (DHIL) モデルは,分子内および分子間相互作用を階層的にモデル化することによって,タンパク質-リガンド結合親和 (PLBA) の予測を改善します. このディープラーニングのアプローチは 薬剤発見スクリーニングの精度を高めます
科学分野:
- コンピュータ化学
- 薬物の発見
- バイオ情報学
背景:
- タンパク質-リガンド結合親和性 (PLBA) は,薬剤スクリーニングにおいて極めて重要です.
- ディープラーニングモデルでは 類似性の予測が期待されています
- 既存の方法は,しばしば分子内および分子間相互作用を独立して処理し,精度を制限します.
研究 の 目的:
- タンパク質とリガンドの相互作用を総合的にモデリングするために,新しいアプローチである二重チャネルヒエラルキカルインタラクティブラーニング (DHIL) を提案する.
- 相互作用タイプ間の階層的依存関係を明示的にモデル化することによって,PLBA予測の精度を向上させる.
主な方法:
- DHILは,分子内および分子間相互作用を同時に学習するために二重チャネルエンコーディング構造を使用します.
- 階層的なインタラクティブ・ラーニング・パラダイムは,インタラクション・タイプ間の多レベルな情報交換を容易にする.
- このアプローチは,生物学的システムのローカルからグローバルへの処理を模倣し,詳細な相互作用を表現します.
主要な成果:
- DHILは,ベンチマークデータセットのPLBA予測精度を大幅に改善します.
- このモデルは結合親和性を予測する現行の方法よりも優れている.
- 薬の発見とスクリーニングにおける DHILの有効性を検証しています
結論:
- DHILは,タンパク質-リガンドの相互作用をモデル化するためのより包括的かつ正確な方法を提供します.
- 階層的なモデリングアプローチは,親近性予測能力を高めます.
- 将来の作業は,計算上のオーバーヘッドと入力コンファメーションの品質に対する感度に対処する必要があります.
関連する概念動画
Ligand Binding Sites
13.2K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.2K
Protein-protein Interfaces
13.2K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
13.2K
Conserved Binding Sites
4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
13.4K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.4K
Ligand Binding and Linkage
4.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked. In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.9K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
8.0K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.0K


