Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

635
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
635
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

196
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
196
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

822
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
822
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

675
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
675

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Practical considerations when using the covariate-adjusted log-rank test for the analysis of time-to-event endpoints in oncology trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: From general theory to practical insights.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Adaptive Designs in Trials With Time-to-Event Endpoints and Covariate Adjustment.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Right and Left Atrial Dysfunction as Independent Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A UK Biobank Study.

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

ケース2の研究における影響に対する感受性分析

Kan Chen1, Ting Ye2, Dylan S Small3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, 655 Huntington Avenue, SPH2, 4th fl, Boston, MA, United States.

Biometrics
|August 23, 2025
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

ケーススタディのデザインは,ケースを比較することによって治療効果を理解するのに役立ちます. この研究は,ケーススタディにおける現実的な仮定の違反と未測定の混同に対処するための新しい感受性分析を導入します.

キーワード:
関連効果ケース2研究観察研究選択バイアス感受性分析

さらに関連する動画

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

696
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

696
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

科学分野:

  • 流行病学について
  • バイオ統計学
  • 原因推論

背景:

  • ケーススタディの設計は,治療効果の推論に使用されます.
  • "懸念されるケース"の扱いを他のケースと比較します.
  • 治療なしでは発生しない症例を推定する.

研究 の 目的:

  • ケーススタディのための感受性分析の枠組みを導入する.
  • 推論の偏差が因果的効果の推論に与える影響を評価する.
  • ケース・ケース・デザインで測定されていない混同効果を評価する.

主な方法:

  • ケーススタディのための感受性分析の枠組みを開発した.
  • 重要な仮定からの偏差を評価するためにフレームワークを適用しました.
  • 測定されていない混同に対する感度分析が含まれています.

主要な成果:

  • この研究は,ケーススタディでの推論を精査する方法を提供しています.
  • 感受性の分析は,仮定の違反の影響を明らかにします.
  • 方法論は現実世界のデータセットを使用して実証されています.

結論:

  • 提案された感受性分析は,ケーススタディの発見の強さを高めます.
  • 標準的な仮定の限界をリアルデータアプリケーションで解決します.
  • このアプローチは,観察研究における因果推論に有用である.