Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

5.2K
The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it...
5.2K
Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

156
The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
156
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

13.6K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
13.6K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

675
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
675
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

822
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
822

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Unravelling emergency department triage in everyday practice: An ethnographic study of underlying mechanisms across three Danish emergency departments.

BMC emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of a digital alcohol intervention targeting online help-seekers: a simulation study of incidence of disease, quality-adjusted life-years and costs.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Frontline staff experiences of bridging dual diagnosis treatments - Determinants for implementing a cross-sectoral collaboration model.

Addiction science & clinical practice·2026
Same author

A national survey of primary care physicians' self-reported use of and attitudes to telemedicine consultations with patients in Sweden.

Digital health·2026
Same author

Culture eats evidence for breakfast: how culture influences implementation of evidence-based practices.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

The theory behind the strategies: interpreting the expert recommendations for implementing change taxonomy through four behavioural lenses.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same journal

Growing implementation scientists: NHLBI's K12 programs in heart, lung, blood, and sleep research.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same journal

Implementing a multimodal lifestyle intervention for depression and overweight in primary and secondary care: protocol for an implementation study exploring what works, how, and under what conditions.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same journal

Implementation determinants and outcomes in the Philadelphia TelePrEP Program: a mixed methods study of client and staff perspectives.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same journal

Implementing pharmacogenetic-guided prescribing in general practice: a qualitative process evaluation.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same journal

Implementing systems- and organisational-level change to advance gender equality in healthcare leadership: a mixed-methods implementation protocol.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same journal

Harmonizing intervention, context, and implementation strategies with Context-Driven Co-Design (CD2).

Implementation science communications·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

実施の楽観を和らげる:実施研究における有効性と効果の区別

Per Nilsen1,2, Jeanette Wassar Kirk3,4, Katarina Ulfsdotter Gunnarsson5

  • 1Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. per.nilsen@liu.se.

Implementation science communications
|August 24, 2025
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

実施の有効性から実施の有効性を区別することは,現実的な介入研究にとって極めて重要です. これは研究条件を明確にし,研究結果を強化します.

キーワード:
有効性について効率性について戦略

さらに関連する動画

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
10:49

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field

Published on: March 16, 2019

8.6K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
10:49

Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field

Published on: March 16, 2019

8.6K

科学分野:

  • 実施科学
  • 医療サービス研究
  • 介入研究

背景:

  • 介入の有効性 (理想的条件) と有効性 (現実の環境) の違いが示されています.
  • 介入の有効性はしばしば実施準備の代理として使用されますが,実際の結果を過大評価することがあります.
  • 通常の練習環境の複雑さはしばしば見過ごされ,楽観的な期待につながります.

研究 の 目的:

  • 実施の有効性と実施の有効性の区別を導入し,強調する.
  • この区別が実施研究にとって極めて重要であることを強調する.
  • 戦略の実施条件を評価するためのツールを提案する.

主な方法:

  • 実施の有効性 (制御された条件) と実施の有効性 (典型的な設定) の概念を紹介する.
  • 実施研究でこの区別を 実行化することが不可欠だと主張する.
  • PRECIS-2の枠組みを研究条件の評価のための"実装PRECIS"ツールに適応することを提案する.

主要な成果:

  • 効能と有効性の区別は,現在の実施研究ではめったに明示されない.
  • 研究は日常の実践を どの程度反映しているかによって 異なるので 解釈は複雑です
  • 戦略の実現可能性の評価を妨げている.

結論:

  • 実施の効果と効果を明確にすることで 研究の設計,解釈,コミュニケーションが向上します
  • この区別は,介入の複製と拡大に関する情報に基づいた決定を支持します.
  • この区別を明示的にすることは,より実用的で透明な実装科学にとって不可欠です.