Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.0K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.5K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.9K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.9K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

On the possibility of hybrid chalcogenide perovskite photovoltaics.

Faraday discussions·2026
Same author

Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with verification biased data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

TAMs in the Gynecological Tumor Microenvironment: Insights from Cross-Cancer Studies for Immunotherapy.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Nanoparticle-Induced Breast Cancer Cell Death: The Associated Mechanisms of Seven Major Cell Death Pathways in Preclinical Models and a Cross-Validation Model.

Cells·2026
Same author

6PPD-quinone promotes ovarian cancer progression: Insights from network toxicology, machine learning, and in vitro validation.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2026
Same author

Methodological Approaches for the Estimation of Confidence Intervals on Partial Youden Index Under Verification Bias.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

検証バイアスによる3クラスユーデン指数の区間推定

Shuangfei Shi1, Shirui Wang1, Gengsheng Qin1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics
|August 25, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

この研究では,診断の精度評価における検証バイアスを修正するための新しい方法が導入されています. これらのテクニックは,特に部分的に確認された疾患の状況において,医学的な検査のための最適な切断点の選択を改善します.

科学分野:

  • バイオ統計学
  • 医療診断
  • 医療サービス研究

背景:

  • 診断の正確性の評価は,医療検査において極めて重要です.
  • 検証バイアスは,真の疾患状態が部分的に不明であるときに発生し,バイアスの評価につながります.
  • 既存のユーデン指数は,この検証バイアスを考慮していません.

研究 の 目的:

  • 3つのクラスのユーデン指数のための新しい信頼区間を開発する.
  • 診断精度試験における検証バイアスを修正する.
  • 診断検査のより良い選択のための方法を提供します.

主な方法:

  • 3つのクラスのユーデン指数の信頼区間の統計的方法の開発.
  • 病態に関するMAR仮説による方法の適用
  • 3つの病気の段階を分類する診断検査に重点を置く.

主要な成果:

  • 検証バイアスを効果的に修正する方法
  • 新しい信頼区間により,ユーデン指数の推定値がより正確になります.
  • このアプローチにより,最適な切断点の選択が改善されます.
キーワード:
バイアスの修正ユーデン指数3つのクラスに分類する検証バイアス

さらに関連する動画

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909

結論:

  • 開発された方法は,診断精度研究における検証バイアスを扱うための堅実なアプローチを提供します.
  • 診断試験の精度が向上し,特に3つのクラスシナリオの精度が向上する.
  • この作業は,診断試験の有用性についてより情報に基づいた決定を下すのに役立ちます.