Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

243
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
243
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

188
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
188
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

133
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
133
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

199
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
199

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Human rights and the social determinants of mental health: fostering interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2025
Same author

Predicting the Risk of Future Terrorism: Lessons for Mental Health Experts from the Benbrika Case.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Interdisciplinary Collaboration in the Mental Health Sector: Legislating the Victorian Collaborative Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing.

Journal of law and medicine·2024
Same author

Human rights promotion and the 'Geneva impasse' in mental healthcare: scoping review.

BJPsych open·2023
Same author

An analysis of arguments for the retention of the defence of mental impairment.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2023
Same author

Seizures, Postictal States and Criminal Responsibility.

Journal of law and medicine·2022

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

575

アルゴリズムによるリスク評価と専門家による証拠

Bernadette McSherry1

  • 1Emeritus Professor, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. The author would like to thank Andrew Simon-Butler for his research assistance.

Journal of law and medicine
|August 25, 2025
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

法医学的なリスク評価ツールは 法的判断を助けますが 独占的なアルゴリズムは 倫理的および法的懸念を提起します 組織化された専門的な判断は 臨床的な専門知識と ツールとのバランスをとります

キーワード:
ルーミス VS ウィスコンシンアルゴリズムリスク評価構造化された専門的判断

さらに関連する動画

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

575
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

科学分野:

  • 法医学心理学
  • 法医学
  • 犯罪学

背景:

  • リスク評価は法的状況,特に刑事法において極めて重要です.
  • 刑事心理学者や精神科医は 将来の犯罪活動のリスクを評価します
  • 使用されているツールには,統計的または精算的リスク予測スケールが含まれます.

研究 の 目的:

  • 法医学リスク評価における倫理的・法的問題を強調する.
  • 独自のリスク評価アルゴリズムの影響について議論する.
  • 構造化された専門的な判断に現在の重点を置く.

主な方法:

  • 法医学リスク評価の現状の検討
  • 構造化された専門的な判断のアプローチの分析
  • 民間リスク評価ツールがもたらす倫理的,法的課題の検討

主要な成果:

  • リスク評価のツールは 訴訟の不可欠な要素です
  • 構造化された専門的な判断は,保険学的なデータと臨床的専門知識を統合します.
  • リスク評価ツールの非公開アルゴリズムは,重大な倫理的,法的ジレンマを生み出します.

結論:

  • 民間企業による不透明なリスク評価アルゴリズムの使用は,倫理的,法的課題を提起しています.
  • アクチュアリアルデータと臨床判断と透明性のバランスは 公正な法的適用に不可欠です
  • 法医学リスク評価ツールの規制と透明性については,さらなる議論が必要である.