Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.5K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

965
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
965
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Characterization of Immune Infiltrating Cells in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma and Its Clinical Significance.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing data extraction in randomized clinical trials with large language models.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Diagnostic performance of advanced large language models in cystoscopy: evidence from a retrospective study and clinical cases.

BMC urology·2025
Same author

UHRF1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition mediating renal fibrosis by activating the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

RRM2 Is a Putative Biomarker and Promotes Bladder Cancer Progression via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway.

Journal of cellular physiology·2024
Same author

Lactobacillus-Polydopamine System for Targeted Drug Delivery in Overactive Bladder: Evidence from Bladder Cell Spheroids, Rat Models, and Urinary Microbiome Profiling.

International journal of nanomedicine·2024

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K

泌尿器科におけるデータ抽出エラーとその影響:プロトコル

Zuhaer Yisha1,2, Linfa Guo3, Aodun Gu3

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

International journal of surgery protocols
|August 27, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

泌尿器科の体系的なレビューにおけるデータ抽出の誤りは 根拠に基づいた医療を脅かしている. この研究は,これらのレビューにおけるデータの再現性を評価し,信頼性の高い発見を確保するために,証拠合成の厳格な審査の必要性を強調しています.

キーワード:
データ抽出エラー証拠合成の実践再現性について泌尿器科

さらに関連する動画

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K

科学分野:

  • 泌尿器科
  • 医療情報学
  • 証拠 に 基づく 医学

背景:

  • 医療の意思決定には 体系的なレビューが不可欠です
  • 泌尿器科の体系的なレビューにおけるデータ抽出の誤りは,しばしば見過ごされる重大な脅威です.
  • 厳格な検査が欠けている 泌尿器科のレビューが増えています

研究 の 目的:

  • 泌尿器科の体系的なレビューにおけるデータ再現性の問題を調査する.
  • 証拠を集約する際の 精査の必要性を強調する
  • 泌尿器科の証拠合成における方法論的厳密さと結論の妥当性を高める.

主な方法:

  • 58の泌尿器学雑誌 (PubMed,Embase) の体系的なレビューのデータ抽出エラーを調査した.
  • ランダム化制御試験のメタ解析を備えた選択されたレビュー.
  • 2人の独立審査員によるデータ抽出 元の情報源と交叉検証 複数のレベルで分類されたエラー
  • 統計分析では誤差の発生率とメタ分析結果への影響が評価され,感度分析では欠落したデータの影響が調査された.

主要な成果:

  • メタ分析結果に対するデータ抽出エラーの発生率と影響を評価した.
  • 欠落したデータが研究結果に与える影響を調べるために,感受性分析が行われました.

結論:

  • 泌尿器科の体系的なレビューにおけるデータ抽出エラーの重要な問題に対処する.
  • 方法論的厳格性を高め,証拠合成における結論の妥当性を向上させる.
  • 体系的なレビューの質に関する貴重な洞察を提供し,証拠に基づいた実践の将来の改善を導く.