インクルーシブ・リーダーシップとクリエイティブ・テリトリー行動: 三重のインタラクティブ・モダレーティング・エフェクト・モデル
Guanfeng Shi1,2, Ziyi Zhang1
1School of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 28, 2025
まとめ
包摂的なリーダーシップは 調和した仕事への情熱を育み 従業員の創造的な行動に ポジティブな影響を及ぼします この効果は,従業員が高い仕事自主性と地位競争の動機を持っているときに最も強くなります.
科学分野:
- 組織的行動
- 労働心理学
背景:
- 自己決定理論と環境認知行動の枠組みが,この研究を導く.
- リーダーシップの研究における重要な仲介者として探求されています.
研究 の 目的:
- 従業員のクリエイティブ・テリトリアの行動における 包摂的なリーダーシップのメカニズムを調査する
- 調和のとれた仕事と情熱の仲介的な役割を調べる
- 仕事の自律性と地位競争の動機を伴う三方向の相互作用モデルをテストする.
主な方法:
- 状況実験 (第1研究) と複数回のアンケート調査 (第2研究) を実施した.
- データ分析は,メディエーションと中和メディエーション効果に焦点を当てた.
主要な成果:
- 協調的な仕事の情熱は 包摂的なリーダーシップと 創造的な地域行動の関係を媒介します
- 創造的な領域の行動に対する 包摂的なリーダーシップのポジティブな影響は 高い仕事自律性と高い地位競争の動機によって増幅されます
- インクルーシブなリーダーシップ,仕事の自律性,地位競争の動機の間で重要な三方向の相互作用が発見されました.
結論:
- 包摂的なリーダーシップは 調和した仕事への情熱を通して 従業員の創造的な領域の行動を高めることができます
- 仕事の自律性を最適化し 地位競争を理解することは 包摂的なリーダーシップの恩恵を最大化するために 極めて重要です
- 職場環境を改善し,従業員の負の行動を減らすためのインセンティブ戦略を 提供しています.
関連する概念動画
01:37Social Loafing
35.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.9K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
01:14Rotter's Locus of Control
426
Julian Rotter introduced the concept of locus of control, a cognitive factor that significantly influences personality development and learning. Locus of control refers to an individual's beliefs about the extent of control they have over events in their lives. According to Rotter, this belief system can be categorized into two types: internal and external locus of control.
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
426
02:12Relationship Formation
41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
01:27Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.2K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.2K
00:56Attribution Theory
13.4K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.4K