EuCARE プロジェクトの国際多センター研究における医療従事者のワクチン接種の躊躇の要因
Francis Drobniewski1, Marcia Ashmi2, Dian Kusuma3,4
1Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK. f.drobniewski@imperial.ac.uk.
Scientific reports
|August 28, 2025
まとめ
医療従事者は,長期の安全性について懸念を抱いて,重要なCOVID-19ワクチンへの躊躇を示しています. ワクチンに対する信頼と 医療従事者の多様な集団の受け入れを高めるには 量身の定めた戦略が必要である.
科学分野:
- 公衆衛生
- ワクチン学
- 労働衛生について
背景:
- 保健医療従事者 (HCW) のワクチン接種への躊躇は,公衆衛生イニシアチブに課題を投げかけています.
- HCWのワクチンに対する態度に影響を与える要因を理解することは,ワクチン接種率を改善するために極めて重要です.
研究 の 目的:
- 国際的な医療従事者の多様なグループにおけるCOVID-19とインフルエンザワクチンの躊躇性を評価する.
- ワクチン接種に躊躇する要因を特定し,ワクチンの受け入れを向上させるための潜在的な戦略を探求する.
主な方法:
- リトアニア,ポルトガル,ポーランド,ドイツ,ブラジルで2079人の医療従事者を対象に匿名調査が行われました.
- この調査では,COVID-19およびインフルエンザワクチンに対する態度,認識されたリスク,および義務的ワクチン接種に関する意見に関するデータを収集した.
主要な成果:
- 医療従事者の44%以上は,COVID-19ワクチンの長期的な安全性に対する信頼を欠いており,10%はワクチンを病気よりもリスクが高いと認識しています.
- 強制的なCOVID-19ワクチン接種に対する支持は,HCWと学生のインフルエンザワクチン接種よりも高かった.
- 教育レベル,職業,地理的な位置は ワクチン接種の躊躇と関連しており, 医療従事者に対する信頼は政治家よりも高かった.
結論:
- 教育,職業,場所によって影響を受け,HCWの間で重要なCOVID-19ワクチンのためらいは存在します.
- 標的を絞った介入,職場でのワクチンの利用可能性,仲間からの影響は,予防接種を奨励する鍵です.
- 一般的なワクチンのプロモーションには,特定のHCWサブグループと文脈に適応する必要があります.
関連する概念動画
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
12.3K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
12.3K
Vaccinations
45.3K
Overview
45.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
671
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
671
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
2.8K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
2.8K
Factors Affecting Illness
4.4K
When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
4.4K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
261
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
261


