Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.5K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.8K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Safety-Driven Response Adaptive Randomization: An Application in Noninferiority Oncology Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Sotatercept reduces bone morphogenetic protein signaling in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

A burn-in(g) question: How long should an initial equal randomization stage be before Bayesian response-adaptive randomization?

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Drug Development for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Unleashing the Potential of Single-Patient Studies Using Continuous Monitoring.

Pulmonary circulation·2025
Same author

Implementing response-adaptive randomisation in stratified rare-disease trials: Design challenges and practical solutions.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Implementing response-adaptive designs when responses are missing: Impute or ignore?

Statistical methods in medical research·2025

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

バイナリ応答の最適配分の再検討:タイプIエラーレート制御を考慮する洞察

Lukas Pin1, Sofía S Villar1, William F Rosenberger2

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.

Biometrics
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

この研究は,タイプIのエラー率を制御する臨床試験のための新しい最適配分方法を導入します. これらの方法は,適応試験の設計における統計的インフレを 堅く管理することによって患者の結果を改善します.

キーワード:
ネイマン配分RSHIRの配分ウォルドテスト患者給付スコアテスト

さらに関連する動画

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

科学分野:

  • 臨床試験の設計
  • バイオ統計学
  • 統計的推論

背景:

  • レスポンス・アダプティブ・デザインは,タイプIのエラー率を膨らませることができ,この問題は十分に文書化されていません.
  • 適応的な設計におけるタイプIエラー率の膨張を減らすための既存の方法は,堅固ではありません.

研究 の 目的:

  • タイプIエラー率の膨張を制御する応答適応型設計のための新しい最適配分比を開発する.
  • 臨床試験における統計的なインフレを管理するための既存の方法の限界に対処する.

主な方法:

  • スコアテストと有限サンプル推定器を使用して2つの最適な配分比率を導出しました.
  • 最適化問題の策定に堅実な統計的テストと推定器を組み込んだ.
  • 初期段階および確認試験データを用いたシミュレーションによって評価された設計.

主要な成果:

  • 提案された最適な配分比は,タイプIのエラー率の上昇を効果的に制御します.
  • 新しいデザインは 既存の方法と比較して 患者の治療結果において 相当な利点をもたらします
  • スコアテストと有限サンプル推定器はより堅実な解決策を提供します.

結論:

  • 新しい最適比率設計は,適応試験におけるタイプIエラー率を制御するための堅固な方法を提供します.
  • これらの設計は 統計的整合性を保ちながら 患者の治療結果を改善します
  • フレームワークは様々な結果と試験構造に適応できます.