Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Torts III01:26

Torts III

754
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
754
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

760
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
760
Torts II01:13

Torts II

686
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
686
Torts I01:14

Torts I

1.3K
Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
1.3K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

725
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
725
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

1.8K
Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
1.8K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Commercial prices relative to Medicare were lower under an employer-based reference pricing program.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Low-Value Care Following Hospital and Private Equity Acquisition in Primary Care.

Medical care research and review : MCRR·2026
Same author

Changes in Maternal Care and Infant Health After Noneconomic Damage Cap Repeals.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Recent minimum wage policies and their association with suicide and poisoning deaths.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Impact on hospitals of price reductions for physician-administered biologics.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Regulating quasi-legal markets: Evidence from pain management clinic laws.

Journal of public economics·2026

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

572

非経済的損害上限と医療ミス保険料の廃止

Yuji Mizushima1, Christopher Whaley1,2, Hao Yu3

  • 1RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Health economics
|August 31, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

非経済的損害の上限を廃止すると,特に州最高裁判所の判決と外科専門医の保険料が増加します. これは,撤廃が制定よりも大きな影響を与えることを示唆しています.

キーワード:
医療ミス保険医者の責任プレミアム州訴訟改革について

さらに関連する動画

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice
06:59

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice

Published on: January 23, 2019

17.9K
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
10:35

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances

Published on: July 5, 2011

46.5K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

572
Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice
06:59

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice

Published on: January 23, 2019

17.9K
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
10:35

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances

Published on: July 5, 2011

46.5K

科学分野:

  • 健康経済学
  • 医療ミスに関する法律
  • 公的政策

背景:

  • 医療ミス訴訟における非経済的損害の上限は,医師の費用と患者の福祉への潜在的な影響のために議論されています.
  • 州レベルでの政策は様々で,一部では上限を制定し,一部では撤廃し,継続的な論争を反映しています.

研究 の 目的:

  • 医療ミス保険料に対する非経済的損害上限の廃止の影響を分析する.
  • 保険料の変動に対する異なる種類の裁判所の決定 (州最高裁判所と州巡回裁判所) の影響を比較する.
  • 異なる医者の専門分野におけるプレミアムインパクトの変動を調査する.

主な方法:

  • 撤廃の因果関係を評価するために,差異の差異分析を使用した.
  • 撤廃事件前と後のプレミアム変化を比較するためにデータを分析した.
  • この研究では,裁判所の決定と医師の専門分野に基づいて影響が区分されました.

主要な成果:

  • 非経済的損害の上限を廃止することで保険料が増加することが判明しました.
  • 州最高裁判所の判決は州巡回裁判所の判決と比べると大幅に増加しました.
  • 産婦人科と整体外科の専門医は 内科よりも大きなプレミアム増加を経験しました.

結論:

  • 非経済的損害の上限を廃止すると,医療ミス保険料が高くなります.
  • 保険料の増加の大きさは,裁判所の決定や医師の専門分野によって影響を受けます.
  • 非経済的なダメージの上限を撤廃することと制定することの効果には不均衡があるかもしれません.