研究者投資ツールの開発,有効性,信頼性
Brenda M Joly1, Carolyn Gray2, Kassandra Cousineau3
1Public Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Journal of clinical and translational science
|September 2, 2025
まとめ
新しい研究者投資ツール (RIT) は,臨床および翻訳研究者のキャリアの初期段階の進歩を測定します. この検証済みのアンケートでは,個々の研究キャリアの軌跡が記録され,投資への影響評価に役立ちます.
科学分野:
- 臨床研究と翻訳研究
- 研究 キャリア 開発
- サイコメトリクス
背景:
- 大規模な投資により,臨床・転化研究者のキャリアの初期段階 (CTR) を支援しています.
- 研究の継続性に沿った個々の進歩を測定するためのツールがない.
- 研究者の発達を一貫して測定する必要がある.
研究 の 目的:
- 新しい研究者投資ツール (RIT) を導入する.
- 研究者キャリアの軌道の個々の変化を測定するための一貫した方法を提供する.
- RITの心理学的特性を評価する.
主な方法:
- 8つの領域と4つのサブ領域を含む90項目のアンケート (RIT) を作成しました.
- 評価された顔と内容の妥当性
- 評価された内部一貫性とテスト再テストの信頼性
主要な成果:
- 強い内容の有効性と良好な内部一貫性 (クロンバッハのアルファ: 0.850.97).
- 安定したテスト再テスト信頼性 (ピアソンの相関:0.700.98).
- RITは強力な心理学的特性を示しています.
結論:
- 研究者投資ツール (RIT) は新しい検証されたツールです.
- RITは 臨床研究と翻訳研究における 個々の進歩を一貫して測定できます
- 研究者に対するCTR投資の影響を評価するのに有用です.
さらに関連する動画
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
908
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
9.3K
関連する概念動画
Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Measures of Intelligence
7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
453
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
453
Data Validation
234
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
234
Factorial Design
13.3K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.3K
Naturalistic Observations
15.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.9K
