個別レベルの研究経験,活動,成果を測定するためのアプローチとツール:ナラティブレビュー
Brenda M Joly1, Carolyn Gray2, Julia Rand1
1Public Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Journal of clinical and translational science
|September 2, 2025
まとめ
研究者のキャリアを評価するには より良いツールが必要です 現在行われている対策は,研究生産性だけに集中し,個人の経験とキャリア開発の全範囲を考慮していない.
科学分野:
- 医療と生物医学の研究者育成
- 研究者としてのキャリアの進展と評価
背景:
- 研究職の強化は,変化する健康と生物医学上の課題に取り組む上で極めて重要です.
- 研究者のキャリアの軌跡と支援システムを理解することは 効果的な人材育成の鍵です
研究 の 目的:
- 2000年から2024年までの研究者を評価するために使用される個人レベルの評価策と調査ツールの見直しと分類.
- 研究者の経験の全範囲を把握するための現在の評価方法のギャップを特定する.
主な方法:
- 出版された文献のナレーションレビュー (2000-2024年).
- 評価手段と調査ツールの抽象化,分類,コード化
- 特定された措置を6つの研究カテゴリーに分類する.
主要な成果:
- 各カテゴリーにまたがる様々な測定法がありますが,多くは狭く,出力に焦点を当てています (例えば,図書館計測).
- 一般的な指標は研究者の経験の幅ではなく 研究の生産性を評価するものです
- 個々の研究努力,支援,影響の評価のための包括的なツールには大きなギャップがあります.
結論:
- 研究者のキャリアの多面性を評価するには,既存の評価ツールが不十分であることが多い.
- 総合的な,コンストラクット主導の,個人レベルでの対策の開発は,研究人員をより良く評価するために必要である.
さらに関連する動画
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
1.2K
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
9.5K
関連する概念動画
Case Studies
12.1K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.1K
Quantifying Work
21.1K
As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.
21.1K
Surveys
15.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.3K
Data Collection by Experiments
25.2K
Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public...
An example of the experimental method is a public...
25.2K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Archival Research
16.4K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.4K
