郡レベルでの住宅隔離と,米国の成人の座っている行動
Mohammad Moniruzzaman1, Yangyang Deng2, Breanna Rogers2
1Socio-Spatial Determinants of Health (SSDH) Laboratory, Population and Community Health Sciences Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. mohammad.moniruzzaman@nih.gov.
Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors
|September 2, 2025
まとめ
この研究では 非ヒスパニックの黒人とヒスパニックの成人の間で 居住区隔離と静止状態の間の関連性は見つかりませんでした 座っている時間は,性別に関係なく,分離レベルによって異なります.
科学分野:
- 公衆衛生
- 社会環境 健康
- 流行病学
背景:
- 過剰な静止生活 (SB) は,米国における重要な公衆衛生問題です.
- 住居隔離がSBに与える影響は,社会生態学的観点からあまり研究されていない.
- これらの環境要因を理解することは,標的を絞った介入の開発に不可欠です.
研究 の 目的:
- 郡レベルの住居隔離と毎日座っている時間の間の関連を調査する.
- これらの関係を全米の成人のサンプルで調査し,特に非ヒスパニック系黒人とヒスパニック系住民に焦点を当てた.
- セグレーションとSBとの関連における潜在的な性差を調査する.
主な方法:
- AmeriSpeakパネル (2019年) の2,637人の米国人 (20歳から75歳) の横断分析.
- 前日のリコール (ACT24) を用いて測定された静止時間.
- 非ヒスパニック系黒人およびヒスパニック系成人の郡レベルの隔離指数を使用して定量化された居住区隔離; コバリアートに調整され,性別によって階層化された回帰モデル.
主要な成果:
- アメリカの成人は平均して 9.5時間/日 座っていると報告しています
- 非ヒスパニック系黒人の住居隔離と静止時間との間に有意な関連性が見つかりませんでした (p=0. 790).
- ヒスパニックの居住隔離と静止時間 (p=0.743) の間には有意な関連性が見られなかった.性別分析もゼロの結果を示した.
結論:
- この研究では,非ヒスパニックの黒人とヒスパニックの成人の間で 居住区隔離と静止行動との関連性に関する証拠は見つかりませんでした.
- これらの関連性は,性別によって有意に変化しなかった.
- これらの発見を確認するために,特に少数派集団からのより大きなサンプルを用いた将来の研究が推奨されます.
さらに関連する動画
関連する概念動画
Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Surveys
15.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.4K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.4K
Relationship Formation
41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
671
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
671
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K


