差別に対する後悔:下位グループメンバーに対する憎悪犯罪を判断する際のグループ支配の役割
Andrés Gvirtz1, Patrick F Kotzur2, Andrew L Stewart3
1King's Business School, King's College London, London, UK.
The British journal of social psychology
|September 3, 2025
まとめ
社会的支配的傾向は正義の認識に影響する. 社会的支配的指向 (SDO) の高い個人は,反省的な謝罪に対する厳しい処罰を提唱し,グループ間の関係や法的判断に影響を与える可能性があります.
科学分野:
- 社会心理学
- 法学心理学
- グループ間関係
背景:
- 権力ダイナミクスは,法制度内のグループ間関係を大きく形作る.
- 盲目の正義の理想に挑戦する 低権力集団に対する 被害の訴追に影響を与えます
研究 の 目的:
- 支配的なグループのメンバーが従属グループに与えた害に対する刑罰の判断に,社会的支配的指向 (SDO) がどのように影響するかを調査する.
- これらの判断に対する 後悔の謝罪の 緩和効果を調べるため
主な方法:
- 3つの実験が実施され, プライバシー侵害,銃撃,従属グループ (ゲイ,黒人,難民) のメンバーを標的とした攻撃のシナリオが実施されました.
- 参加者の社会的支配的傾向 (SDO) を評価し,罪を犯した者に対する罰の適切性についての認識を,後悔の謝罪と否かに計測した.
- 米国とドイツで合計540人の参加者を対象に研究が行われました.
主要な成果:
- 4件のうち3件で SDOが高い人は 悔悟して謝罪した加害者に 厳しい罰を与えるべきだと主張しました
- これは,グループ支配の欲求が,後悔した犯罪者に対して,期待とは対照的に,容赦が少ないことを示唆しています.
- SDO,謝罪,懲罰的な態度との複雑な関係を示しています.
結論:
- 社会的支配的傾向は 集団の境界を越えた 害に対する懲罰的な態度を形作る上で 重要な役割を果たします
- 罪悪感を伴う謝罪の影響は 集団の優位性に対する個人の傾向によって緩和されます
- これらのダイナミクスを理解することは,グループ間の紛争と法的判断の社会的影響に対処するために不可欠です.
関連する概念動画
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.4K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Groupthink
45.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.3K
Robbers Cave
14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.6K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.6K


