Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.4K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

148
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
148
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

223
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
223
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Moral decision-making 'on the fly'.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Participants' Utilitarian Choice Is Influenced by Gamble Presentation and Age.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

The Effects of Activating Gender-Related Social Roles on Financial Risk-Taking.

Experimental psychology·2023
Same author

Are Impulsive Decisions Always Irrational? An Experimental Investigation of Impulsive Decisions in the Domains of Gains and Losses.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

Problem Gambling 'Fuelled on the Fly'.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

最初の属性は,リスクの高い選択の好みに影響します.

Joseph Teal1, Petko Kusev1, Rose Martin1

  • 1London South Bank University, LSBU Business School, London, UK..

Cognition
|September 6, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

リスク偏好は ダイナミックに構築されます ファースト・アトリビュート・ヒューリスティック (FAH) は,最初のアトリビュートにフォーカスを置くことが選択にどのように影響するかを説明し,好みは"即座に"作られていることを示しています.

科学分野:

  • 行動経済学
  • 認知心理学
  • 意思決定科学

背景:

  • 研究によると リスクの好みは 文脈に基づいて"即座に"構築されます
  • これらのダイナミックな好みの背後にある心理的プロセスに関する理解は限られている.

研究 の 目的:

  • リスクの高い意思決定におけるファースト・アトリビュート・ヒューリスティック (FAH) を提案し,確立する.
  • 心理的なメカニズムを調査する "オン・ザ・フライ" 偏好構造.

主な方法:

  • 最初の利用可能な属性のバイナリ比較に基づいて最初の属性ヒューリスティック (FAH) を開発しました.
  • リスクの高い選択に FAH の影響を検証する実験を3つ行いました

主要な成果:

  • 参加者は,最初に提示されたときに支配的な値を持つオプションを好む傾向を示しました.
  • リスク偏好の"機動的な"構築を支持しています.
  • 意思決定においてFAHの利用が示され,優先度が低いことが示された.

結論:

  • 第一属性ヒューリスティック (FAH) は,ダイナミックなリスク偏好形成に関する新しい説明です.
キーワード:
選択の好み意思決定最初の属性 ヒューリスティックリスク

さらに関連する動画

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
  • FAHはリスクの高い意思決定に 期待される有用性理論や見通し理論のような確立された理論で予測されない方法で 影響を与える.
  • 人間のリスク偏好は文脈に依存し,構築されたものであることを強調する.