経皮的電気鍼治療は内視鏡的粘膜下層剥離術後の腹部術後痛を軽減する:単一施設、前向き、ランダム化比較試験
Xu-Ming Liu1, Yu-Xuan Qi1, Jian-Yong Zheng2
1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) for reducing postoperative abdominal pain in patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric and esophageal neoplasms.
Methods:
A total of 129 patients undergoing ESD were assigned randomly to the TEAS group (64 cases) or the sham group (65 cases) using computer-generated random numbers and stratified by the surgical type (i.e., gastric or esophageal ESD). Patients in the TEAS group were treated bilaterally at the acupoints Hegu (LI 4), Neiguan (PC 6), Zusanli (ST 36), and Shangjuxu (ST 37), with the stimulation current frequency 2/100 Hz and intensity to the patient's maximum tolerance level. Patients in the sham group were treated at sham acupoints, and no electrical stimulation was given from the HANS stimulator. The TEAS and sham stimulations are both given from 30 min before ESD to the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score from 1 to 48 h, morphine consumption after ESD, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Results:
The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 h postoperative period was significantly decreased by TEAS [22 (37.9%) vs. 40 (64.5%), P=0.004]. Patients needing morphine were also reduced by TEAS treatment [19 (32.7%) vs. 40 (64.5%), P<0.01]. TEAS significantly decreased the proportion and incidence of PONV compared with the sham group (P=0.06). Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative adverse events were similar between the two groups. According to the results of multivariate logistic regression, TEAS treatment was a protective factor associated with reduced incidence of NRS scores ⩾4 (OR=0.227; 95% CI: 0.100 to 0.512; P<0.01), whereas patients undergoing gastric ESD had a much lower incidence of NRS scores ⩾ 4 than esophageal ESD (OR=0.287; 95% CI: 0.133 to 0.621; P=0.002).
Conclusions:
TEAS can effectively reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain in patients after ESD. TEAS demonstrates an morphine-sparing effect and reduces the occurrence of PONV. (Registration No. ChiCTR2100052837).
さらに関連する動画
08:20Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Therapeutic Effects of FSN Treatment – Bridging Research and Clinical Applications in Neuropathic Pain
Published on: June 30, 2023
02:41Author Spotlight: Enhancing Women's Chronic Pelvic Pain Management Through Acupoint Catgut Embedding
Published on: May 3, 2024
