人種化されたインポスター症候群尺度の初期構築と検証
Donte L Bernard1, Kevin O Cokley2, Keoshia Harris3
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia.
Journal of counseling psychology
|December 15, 2025
まとめ
人種化されたインポスター症候群尺度(RIPS)は、人種的抑圧に起因する黒人個人の自己不信を測定するために開発されました。RIPSは、これらのユニークな経験を評価するための文化的に関連性のあるツールとして有望です。
科学分野:
- 心理学
- 社会学
- 人種研究
背景:
- インポスター症候群は認識されている心理的経験です。
- 既存の尺度では、黒人個人のユニークな経験を完全に捉えられない場合があります。
- 人種的抑圧と不公平は、知的および職業的自己不信に寄ちます。
研究 の 目的:
- 人種化されたインポスター症候群尺度(RIPS)を開発および検証すること。
- 黒人個人における自己不信の永続的な信念、行動、感情を評価すること。
- 人種的抑圧と不公平がインポスター認知に与える影響を考慮すること。
主な方法:
- それぞれ398人と364人の黒人個人を対象としたサンプルで、探索的および確認的因子分析を実施しました。
- 黒人男性と女性の間で測定不変性を評価しました。
- 関連する心理学的構成概念との関連を通じて、構成概念妥当性を調査しました。
主要な成果:
- 3因子解(内面化された人種的疑念、証明する人種的負担、外面化された人種的疑念)が現れました。
- 3因子モデルはデータと優れた適合性を示しました。
- RIPSは性別間で同様の測定値を示し、インポスター症候群、人種差別の経験、精神的健康、自尊心との有意な関連を示しました。
結論:
- 人種化されたインポスター症候群尺度(RIPS)は、信頼性と妥当性に関する初期の証拠を提供します。
- RIPSは、人種化されたインポスター認知を評価するための文化的に関連性のある楽器です。
- この尺度は、黒人個人に対する体系的な人種差別の心理的影響を理解するために使用できます。
さらに関連する動画
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
4.3K
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
10.1K
関連する概念動画
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.7K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.7K
Stereotype Content Model
15.3K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.3K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
729
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
729
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
41.9K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
41.9K
Implicit Personality Theories
302
Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
302
Deindividuation
30.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.2K
