陣痛誘発と周産期有害転帰：後ろ向きコホート研究
Mathilde Héritier1, Massinissa Aroun2, Catherine Quantin3,4,5
1Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 47 Avenue de Champel, Geneva, 1206, Switzerland.
Background:
The rising overall prevalence of induction of labour (IOL) in high-income countries raises questions about the appropriateness of its clinical indications and concerns about potential adverse perinatal outcomes. The underlying reasons for this increase remain unclear but may include broader clinical indications, changing maternal or foetal conditions, or more maternal requests. This study aimed to assess changes in prevalence of IOL and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from a perinatal registry encompassing all births in a French region. The study included all women who delivered a live-born infant. IOL and perinatal outcomes were obtained from medical records. We first described the overall prevalence of these outcomes, followed by a stratified analysis based on the eight-group Grenoble Classification for IOL indications. Variations in IOL and perinatal outcomes were assessed from 2020 (reference) to 2023, both overall and by group, using Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations.
Results:
The study population included 54,089 women. Overall IOL prevalence rose from 20.7% in 2020 to 28.1% in 2023 (adjusted risk-ratio (aRR) 1.31, 95%CI 1.15-1.49). This increase was mainly driven by higher aRRs in Group-5 [Single cephalic pregnancy ≥41 weeks of gestation (WG)] (34.6% to 42.9%; aRR 1.21, 95%CI 1.10-1.40), Group-6 [Single cephalic pregnancy with maternal pathology from 37 to 40+6 WG] (31.5% to 49.7%; aRR 1.56, 95%CI 1.38-1.75), and Group-7 [Single cephalic pregnancy with foetal pathology from 37 to 40+6 WG] (52.9% to 77.2%; aRR 1.46, 95%CI 1.14-1.88). Adverse outcome changes were observed only in these three groups, with increased emergency caesarean rates in Group-5 (12.4% to 16.4%; aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.40) and Group-7 (13.1% to 19.6%; aRR 1.40, 95%CI 1.04-1.80), as well as higher postpartum haemorrhage rates in Group-5 (5.8% to 7.7%; aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.69) and Group-6 (4.9% to 7.0%; aRR 1.41, 95%CI 1.05-1.90). Neonatal morbidity remained stable.
Conclusions:
The rise in overall IOL prevalence was driven by higher rates in three groups (pregnancies ≥41 WG, maternal and foetal pathology), in which we also observed a clinically meaningful increase in adverse maternal outcomes.
