SiO₂ポリモルフの密度汎関数理論研究における精度と効率のバランス
1Crystallography and Geomaterials Research, Faculty of Geosciences, University of Bremen, Klagenfurter Straße 2-4, D 28359 Bremen, Germany. michael.fischer@uni-bremen.de.
Abstract:
The ability of dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations to reproduce framework densities and relative stabilities of silica polymorphs has been the subject of a number of prior investigations. Most of these studies either considered only a limited number of DFT approaches or included relatively few structures in the validation against experimental data. Using the Gaussian and plane wave DFT code CP2K, this work aims at a more comprehensive assessment, comparing 27 semilocal approaches that include dispersion interactions either by means of a pairwise correction ("Grimme-type" D3) or in the framework of a nonlocal density functional. The set of silica polymorphs encompasses three minerals and 16 all-silica zeolites. For those approaches that perform well with a moderately sized (triple-zeta) basis set, the effect of adding additional basis functions is evaluated. This (slightly) improves the performance in the majority of cases, especially for relative energies. All in all, those functionals that deliver best agreement with experiment achieve overall errors (as expressed by the mean unsigned error) on the order of 0.2 T atoms per 1000 Å3 for framework densities and of 1.0 kJ mol-1 (per SiO2 formula unit) for relative energies. Due to the favourable scaling behaviour of CP2K, structure optimisations of complex zeolites structures are routinely feasible. This is demonstrated through additional calculations for three recently reported all-silica zeolites with extra-large pores.
関連する概念動画
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...


