関連する実験動画
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
薬物開発
Howard H Feldman1,2,3, Karen Messer1,2, Jing Zhang2,1
1Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Background:
Varoglutamstat (PQ912) is an oral small molecule inhibitor of glutaminyl cyclases which reduces the pyroglutamate formation of Aβ and CCL2. Preclinical and Ph1 trials support this Ph2 evaluation in early AD. Our objectives included selecting the highest safe and well-tolerated dose of varoglutamstat with futility analysis at 24 weeks (Ph2A) followed by seamless evaluation of longer-term safety and efficacy at 72 weeks at this dose (Ph2B).
Method:
Participants with biomarker confirmed early AD were randomized to varoglutamstat or placebo. A sequential design tested 3 descending doses (600mg, 300mg, 150mg BID) using a continuous Pocock safety boundary. A Stage Gate futility analysis of the first 180 subjects at 24 weeks was designed to guide the decision from Ph2A-B (Figure 1). The Ph2B primary endpoint was CDR-sum-of-boxes (CDR-SB), with secondary endpoints CFC2, ABC score, spectral EEG, FAQ, ADAS-Cog-13, and NPI.
Result:
Table 1 presents baseline characteristics of the 109 randomized and dosed participants. The first dose cohort of varoglutamstat 600mg or placebo did not cross the safety boundary in Ph2A, supporting this dose selection for all participants thereafter. An abbreviated futility analysis was conducted after the trial was terminated prematurely for administrative reasons, with the provisional result of 'halt enrollment'(yellow) (Figure 1). There were 74% of participants who completed week 24 and 31% week 72 (Figure 2). There were no significant differences between varoglutamstat and placebo in LS mean squares from baseline to week 72 in CDR-SB (-0.05 [95% CI -1.03, 0.92]), CFC2 (0.97 [95% CI -3.34, 5.28]), ABC score (0.10 [95% CI -0.10, 0.30]), FAQ (-0.60 [95% CI -4.22, 3.01]), ADAS-Cog-13 (2.03 [95% CI -2.29, 6.36]); or NPI (-3.09 [95% CI -7.81, 1.62]). At least one TEAE during treatment was reported in 84.9% varoglutamstat and 76.8% placebo with treatment discontinuations due to AE 11.3% varoglutamstat and 3.4% placebo. Severe TEAEs occurred with similar frequencies across arms. Frequency of SAEs/AESIs was 18.9/1.9% varoglutamstat versus 8.9%/5.4% placebo.
Conclusion:
Varoglutamstat was safe and well-tolerated in this VIVA-MIND early AD RCT. Efficacy assessment did not demonstrate any significant treatment benefits however, the available sample was limited. Biomarker results and PK/PD are pending.
さらに関連する動画
08:04In Vitro Three-Dimensional Sprouting Assay of Angiogenesis Using Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells for Vascular Disease Modeling and Drug Testing
Published on: May 11, 2021
05:45Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: October 10, 2025
関連する概念動画
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Discovery: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Drug Regulation