心停止患者における医師と一般市民の認識する適切な蘇生期間と希望する蘇生期間の乖離

This study examined a discrepancy that exists between the duration of resuscitative efforts that physicians perceive as appropriate and the duration that laypersons desire. We conducted an online nationwide cross-sectional survey with 323 physicians and 2,667 laypersons. Physicians were significantly more likely than laypersons to consider a duration of ≥ 30 min as appropriate for resuscitation, especially in younger patients (age 0-6:85% vs. 27%; age 7-17:84% vs. 29%; both p < 0.001). Although these responses arise from fundamentally different psychological frames, identifying this discrepancy may provide a conceptual foundation for discussing more appropriate termination-of-resuscitation approaches in real-world clinical settings.