EFSA 2025のガイドラインとECHAのRAAFの比較評価
Thomas Hartung1,2,3,4, Costanza Rovida4,5
1Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Frontiers in toxicology
|January 2, 2026
まとめ
No abstract available in PubMed .
キーワード:
ECHA RAAF についてEFSA 2025 ガイドライン有害な結果の経路 (AOP)グッド・クロス・プラクティス (GRAP)機械的な類似性新しいアプローチ方法 (NAM)横読する証拠の重ささらに関連する動画
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
3.2K
08:56Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 22, 2024
1.1K
関連する概念動画
Preclinical Development: Overview
5.7K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.7K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
203
Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
203
