Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.6K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.6K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

469
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
469
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

211
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
211
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

39.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.4K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

391
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
391

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Efficient planning and implementation of optimal foraging strategies under energetic constraints.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Maintaining and updating accurate internal representations of continuous variables with a handful of neurons.

Nature neuroscience·2024
Same author

A vast space of compact strategies for effective decisions.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Dynamics of cortical contrast adaptation predict perception of signals in noise.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

The effect of weak clonal interference on average fitness trajectories in the presence of macroscopic epistasis.

Genetics·2022
Same author

Programming cell growth into different cluster shapes using diffusible signals.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same journal

On phase transitions to interdisciplinary and convergent research.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Confident judgments of (mis)information veracity are more, rather than less, accurate.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A cultural explanation for parole decisions in the United States.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A transformer-based language model reveals developmental constraint and network complexity during zebrafish embryogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Dual phosphoregulatory mechanisms of condensin I revealed by biochemical reconstitution.

PNAS nexus·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

環境ダイナミクスがマッチングの最適性に影響を与える

Yipei Guo1,2, Ann M Hermundstad1

  • 1Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.

PNAS nexus
|January 7, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

動物はしばしば選択を報酬確率に一致させる。この研究は、資源補充ダイナミクスが類似している場合にマッチングが最適であるが、ダイナミクスが異なると逸脱が生じ、採餌戦略に影響を与えることを明らかにしている。

キーワード:
選択行動採餌マッチングの法則確率的環境不確実性

さらに関連する動画

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.1K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.1K

科学分野:

  • 行動生態学
  • 意思決定理論
  • 強化学習

背景:

  • 採餌動物は、選択肢間の報酬率を等しくするように選択を割り当てるマッチング行動を示すことが多い。
  • マッチングは、収穫逓減の下で最適となり得るが、最適性は資源補充ダイナミクスにも依存する。
  • 時間構造や補充統計などの環境特性は、資源の利用可能性に影響を与える。

研究 の 目的:

  • 資源補充の環境特性が、採餌動物におけるマッチング行動の最適性にどのように影響するかを調査すること。
  • 最適な採餌方針がマッチングを示す条件を解析的に決定すること。
  • マッチング戦略と最適な戦略との間でパフォーマンスが異なる環境を特定すること。

主な方法:

  • 固定レートで選択肢をサンプリングする採餌エージェントをモデル化すること。
  • 異なる環境補充ダイナミクスにおける報酬確率を導出すること。
  • 最適なマッチング方針の条件を解析的に決定すること。

主要な成果:

  • すべての選択肢が同一の補充ダイナミクスを共有する場合、一般的にマッチングは最適である。
  • 補充ダイナミクスが選択肢間で異なると、最適な方針はマッチングから逸脱する。
  • マッチングからの逸脱（過少または過大マッチング）は、補充プロセスと相対的な報酬率の質的な性質に依存する。

結論:

  • 環境の変動性、特に異なる補充ダイナミクスと変動は、採餌の最適性に大きく影響する。
  • この研究は、動物が複雑な環境に採餌戦略をどのように適応させるかについての検証可能な予測を提供する。
  • これらのダイナミクスを理解することは、行動のばらつきを説明し、意思決定モデルを最適化するために重要である。