下肢支援装置の制御アルゴリズム研究のためのオープンソースかつモジュール式プラットフォーム「LocoD」
Bahareh Ahkami1,2, Kirstin Ahmed1,3,4,5, Morten B Kristoffersen1,6,7
1Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background And Objective:
Commercially available motorized prosthetic legs use exclusively nonbiological signals to control movements, such as those provided by load cells, pressure sensors, and inertial measurement units (IMUs). Although the use of biological signals of neuromuscular origin can provide more natural control of leg prostheses, these signals cannot yet be captured and decoded reliably enough to be used in daily life. Indeed, decoding motor intention from bioelectric signals obtained from the residual limb holds great potential, and therefore, the study of decoding algorithms has increased in the past years, with standardized methods lacking.
Methods:
In the absence of shared tools to record and process lower limb bioelectric signals, such as electromyography (EMG), we developed an open-source software platform to unify the recording and processing (preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification) of EMG and nonbiological signals amongst researchers with the goal of investigating and benchmarking control algorithms. We validated our locomotion decoding (LocoD) software by comparing the accuracy in the classification of locomotion mode using three different combinations of sensors (1 = IMU + pressure sensor + EMG, 2 = EMG, 3 = IMU + pressure sensor). EMG and nonbiological signals (from the IMU and pressure sensor) were recorded while able-bodied participants (n = 21) walked on different surfaces, such as stairs and ramps, and this data set is also released publicly along with this publication. LocoD was used for all recording, preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification of the recorded signals. We tested the statistical hypothesis that there was a difference in predicted locomotion mode accuracy between sensor combinations using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results:
We found that the sensor combination 1 (IMU + pressure sensor + EMG) led to significantly more accurate and improved locomotion mode prediction (Accuracy = 93.4 ± 3.9) than using EMG (Accuracy = 74.56 ± 5.8) or IMU + pressure sensor alone (Accuracy = 90.77 ± 4.6) with p-value <0.001.
Conclusions:
In this study, we introduced and validated the functionality of LocoD as an open-source and modular platform to research control algorithms for prosthetic legs that incorporate bioelectric signals.
関連する概念動画
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Control Systems
At the heart...
Control Systems: Applications
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Electro-mechanical Systems
A key component of the DC motor is the armature, a rotating circuit positioned within a magnetic field. As an electric current passes through the...
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...


