Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

879
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
879
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K
Processes of Self-Presentation01:29

Processes of Self-Presentation

204
Effective self-presentation is a central component of social interaction and identity construction. It relies on the dynamic processes of defining the situation and engaging in self-disclosure. These mechanisms help individuals navigate social context expectations and manage how others perceive them, fostering mutual understanding and relationship development.Defining the SituationSocial situations are shaped by collectively understood frames—a set of widely understood rules or...
204
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.3K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.3K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Shared decision-making in scaling and root planing.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2023
Same author

Toward an operational definition of shared decision making: A conceptual analysis.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2022
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K

共有意思決定か情報共有か?

David W Chambers1

  • 1University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, USA.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
|January 9, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

患者と医療専門家の協力的なアプローチである共有意思決定は、より安定し、満足のいく治療選択につながります。この方法は、個々の意思決定と比較して、倫理的に問題のある結果が少なくなることにもつながります。

キーワード:
交渉最適化患者満足度ランク順選択共有意思決定

さらに関連する動画

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

804
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

804
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

科学分野:

  • 意思決定科学
  • 医療情報学
  • 医療倫理

背景:

  • 患者と医療専門家の意思決定は、同じ情報があっても対立することがあります。
  • 個々の意思決定モデルは、患者と提供者の視点を常に一致させるわけではありません。

研究 の 目的:

  • 個々の方法に代わるものとして、相互の二人意思決定を導入します。
  • 意思決定理論を使用して、共有意思決定(SDM)を定義し、操作化します。

主な方法:

  • 共有意思決定の操作的定義を開発しました。
  • 意思決定プロセスをモデル化するために二人意思決定理論を利用しました。
  • 意思決定満足度のパターンを分析するためにコンピュータシミュレーションを採用しました。

主要な成果:

  • 共有意思決定(SDM)は、より相互に安定し、満足のいく治療上の決定をもたらします。
  • SDMの結果は、道徳的に問題のある結果が少ないことと関連しています。
  • シミュレーションは、一般的な情報条件下でのSDMの優位性を示しました。

結論:

  • 共有情報を取り入れた共有決定は、患者または専門家の独立した選択よりも優れています。
  • SDMは、治療上の決定の質と倫理的地位を高めます。
  • このフレームワークは、協力的な医療上の選択のための堅牢なモデルを提供します。