実装科学の脱植民地化:方法論的多元主義への呼びかけ
Sali Hafez1, Agata Pacho1, Ruth Ponsford1
1Centre for Evaluation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract:
In this Viewpoint, we argue that the project to decolonise implementation science is an important and much needed endeavour, but should move beyond a focus on equity to a more disruptive decolonial approach that interrogates the field's methodological and epistemological foundations. Methodological pluralism in implementation science-one that integrates diverse ways of knowing-is not only more just, but also more effective and scientifically robust. Achieving this requires uncomfortable confrontation with the colonial architecture of academic research and accepted ways of knowing.
関連する概念動画
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...


