急性黄斑下出血に対する硝子体内および黄斑下線溶酵素（tPA）の比較：後向き研究

PurposeThis study compares the anatomical and functional outcomes of two treatments for acute submacular haemorrhage (SMH): pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and gas tamponade versus intravitreal tPA and gas injection.MethodsA retrospective single-centre study was conducted of patients treated for acute SMH at Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients received either intravitreal tPA and gas ± anti-VEGF (Group A) or pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal tPA and gas tamponade ± anti-VEGF (Group B). The primary outcome was anatomical success, defined as displacement of haemorrhage from the fovea. Secondary outcomes were visual acuity (VA) improvement, central foveal thickness (CFT) reduction, and complication rates.ResultsEighty eyes from 73 patients (mean age: 79.8 ± 11.5 years; 57.5% female) were analysed, with 53 eyes in Group A and 27 in Group B. Anatomical success was achieved in 71.6% of Group A and 77.8% of Group B. VA improved in 66% of Group A and 63% of Group B. CFT decreased by over 50% in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the two treatment groups and in anatomical or functional improvement.ConclusionIn this real-world study, both approaches effectively displaced SMH and improved vision with comparable outcomes, suggesting that treatment selection may be best determined by patient-specific and logistical factors.