最適な1,2-プロパンジオールへのグリセロール水素化分解のためのNiCu/AlO(OH)触媒の調整
1Catalysis and Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratories, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan S7N 5A9 Canada akd983@mail.usask.ca +1 (306) 966-4771.
Abstract:
Bimetallic NiCu catalysts supported on boehmite (AlO(OH)) with varying Ni and Cu loadings were synthesized through the sequential wet impregnation technique. The AlO(OH) support, characterized by unique properties and a high surface area, was synthesized using a hydrothermal treatment method. Various characterizations on the prepared series of NiCu/AlO(OH) catalysts confirmed the presence of strong Lewis acid sites, and the absence of large agglomeration. Optimization of Ni and Cu loadings on the support achieved the highest catalytic performance with 25 wt% Ni and 15 wt% Cu at 240 °C and 550 psi hydrogen pressure using 4 wt% catalyst loading, resulting in 92.7% 1,2-PD selectivity and 60.3% yield with 65.1% glycerol conversion in 6 h. Further optimization of operating conditions to make 1,2-PD was conducted within the range of temperature, pressure, and catalyst loadings of 200-230 °C, 350-750 psi, and 4-8 wt%, respectively, via central composite design using Design Expert software. The 25Ni-15Cu/AlO(OH) catalyst at 6 h was chosen for its high 1,2-PD activity, achieving a high glycerol conversion of 62% with a corresponding 1,2-PD yield of 53.4% (86.0% selectivity of 1,2-PD) under the optimization conditions of 240 °C, 515 psi, and 4.1 wt% catalyst loading, closely aligning with experimental efficiency.
関連する概念動画
Radical Substitution: Hydrogenolysis of Alkyl Halides with Tributyltin Hydride
The bonds formed in this reaction are stronger than the bonds broken, making it energetically favorable. The reaction follows a radical chain mechanism similar to radical halogenation reactions,...
Problem-Solving: Tuning of a Guitar String
The string's wave speed can be regulated by varying the linear density. Tension is the other property that determines the speed of...
Electrophilic 1,2- and 1,4-Addition of X2 to 1,3-Butadiene
Electrophilic 1,2- and 1,4-Addition of HX to 1,3-Butadiene
Optimal Foraging
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...


