若い成人における上顎中切歯形態と顔貌形状の3D対応関係
Laura Iosif1, Mihaela Pantea1, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Abstract:
Backround: This cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the proportion of 3D tooth-face superimposition in young adults and examine age- and gender-related differences. Methods: In 98 dental students, intraoral MCI and facial scans were acquired under standardized protocols, processed in Mesh Mixer v. 3.5.474and Blender v. 4.3.2., and aligned to reference planes for superimposition. Residual tooth volume, reflecting tooth-face correspondence, was computed via Boolean subtraction. Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 25 at α = 0.05. Results: Total tooth volume (1,626,120.79 ± 210,659.56 × 103) exceeded the superimposed volume by 285,052.34 × 103 (17.53%; 95% CI: 15.84-19.22%; p < 0.001), giving a superimposition proportion of 82.6%. Positive correlations between total and remaining tooth volumes were observed overall (ρ = 0.448; p < 0.001), in females (ρ = 0.515; p < 0.001), and in participants < 21 years (ρ = 0.662; p < 0.001). Men had higher total tooth volume than women (1,706,232 ± 151,086 vs. 1,583,561 ± 225,978; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Volumetric analysis revealed high but incomplete dentofacial correspondence. Larger tooth volumes were associated with greater incongruence in females and younger participants, confirming volumetric size as a determinant of morphological congruence. Results highlight clinically meaningful superimposition, supporting the MCI as a reliable reference for restorative planning and esthetic reconstructions, and emphasize the value of 3D analysis for precise dentofacial evaluation and individualized esthetic planning.
関連する概念動画
Correspondence Bias
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes
Molecular Shapes
Two regions of electron density in a diatomic...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
The Central Dogma
Molecular Shape and Polarity


