関連する実験動画
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

08:42
A Novel Human Epithelial Enteroid Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Published on: April 10, 2019
8.1K
壊死性腸炎のバイオマーカー:システマティックレビュー
Muhammad Ashhad Faizan1,2, Iffat Khalid1, Asten Yeo1
1Department of Paediatrics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Frontiers in pediatrics
|January 28, 2026
まとめ
壊死性腸炎(NEC)の診断は困難です。このレビューでは、早産児におけるNECの早期検出に高い精度を示すカルプロテクチンや特定の尿タンパク質などのバイオマーカーを特定します。
科学分野:
- 新生児医学
- 消化器病学
- バイオマーカー研究
背景:
- 壊死性腸炎(NEC)は、早産児に影響を与える重度の消化管炎症性疾患です。
- 診断の難しさは、変動する臨床兆候と標準化されたバイオマーカーの欠如に起因します。
- 炎症経路の理解は、早期検出と管理に不可欠です。
研究 の 目的:
- NECの病態における炎症経路をレビューすること。
- 早期NEC検出のための潜在的なバイオマーカーを特定すること。
- 特定されたバイオマーカーの診断精度を評価すること。
主な方法:
- PubMed、Embase、およびCochraneデータベースの体系的な文献検索。
- NECのバイオマーカーの診断精度に焦点を当てた研究が含まれていました。
- PRISMAガイドラインに従い、QUADAS-2ツールを使用してバイアスのリスクを評価しました。
主要な成果:
- NECの病期分類を鑑別するためのバイオマーカーを評価した79の研究を分析しました。
- 糞便および血清カルプロテクチンは高い感度と特異性を示しました。
- 尿タンパク質パネル(CST3、PEDF、RET4)およびDSNLTも有望な診断精度を示しました。
結論:
- カルプロテクチンや特定の尿タンパク質を含むいくつかのバイオマーカーは、早期NEC診断の可能性を示しています。
- これらのバイオマーカーを臨床実践で検証するには、さらなる研究が必要です。
- 正確な早期検出は、NECを有する早産児の転帰を改善することができます。
関連する概念動画
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.2K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.8K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
10.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.9K

