関連する実験動画
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

09:41
Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: July 19, 2019
12.0K
無料かすべてか:死後 autopsies のための近親者の同意を探る
Meagan Chambers1,2, Shera Wanner3, Charlie M Sawyer3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Academic pathology
|February 2, 2026
まとめ
剖検同意率は、無料であっても、性別や主な話される言語によって異なりました。これらの発見は、剖検サービスへのアクセス障壁ではなく、剖検の意思決定の違いを強調しています。
科学分野:
- 検死官および検死官サービス
- 病理学
- 公衆衛生
背景:
- 剖検は、診断の確認、予期せぬ所見の発見、および医学知識の進歩に不可欠です。
- 特にアクセス障壁が取り除かれた場合、多様な人口統計における剖検同意パターンの理解は不可欠です。
研究 の 目的:
- 人種、性別、所得、および主な話される言語グループにおける剖検利用の社会経済的傾向を評価すること。
- 普遍的な同意ポリシーを持つ学術機関における剖検同意の人口統計学的格差を特定すること。
主な方法:
- 2018年から2022年までの院内死亡および剖検の遡及的レビュー。
- 剖検頻度と人口統計学的変数(人種、経済状況、性別、主な話される言語)との比較。
主要な成果:
- 剖検同意率は17.7%(4626人の死亡のうち821人の剖検)でした。
- 剖検は男性、白人、非ヒスパニック系患者、および州内居住者でより一般的でした。
- 女性、アジア人、および英語を母国語としない人は剖検を受ける可能性が低かったです(英語を第二言語とする場合、P<0.00001)。
結論:
- 普遍的で無料の剖検の申し出があっても、性別および主な話される言語に基づく利用における格差が存在します。
- これらの違いは、剖検サービスへのアクセスの制限ではなく、同意決定の違いを示唆しています。
- 観察された同意パターンを裏付ける根本的な理由を理解するには、さらなる研究が必要です。
関連する概念動画
Ethics in Research
25.6K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.6K
Archival Research
17.1K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
17.1K
Confirmation Biases
8.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.2K
Cross-Sectional Research
12.5K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.5K
Longitudinal Research
13.3K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.3K
Naturalistic Observations
17.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.2K

