システマティックレビュー作成における自動引用検索:シミュレーション研究
Darren Rajit1, Lan Du2, Helena Teede1,3
1Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Research synthesis methods
|February 2, 2026
まとめ
OpenAlexとSemantic Scholarを用いた自動引用検索は、システマティックレビューにおいて有望である。精度とF1スコアは向上したが、再現率は低かったため、補助的な戦略としての使用が示唆される。
科学分野:
- 情報科学
- 書誌学
- システマティックレビュー方法論
背景:
- OpenAlexやSemantic Scholarのような書誌アグリゲーターは、システマティックレビューにおける引用検索の自動化の可能性を提供する。
- 自動化された方法は、システマティックレビューの作成効率を高める可能性がある。
研究 の 目的:
- 標準的な戦略に対する自動引用検索のパフォーマンスを評価すること。
- 自動引用検索のパフォーマンスに影響を与える要因を特定すること。
主な方法:
- OpenAlexおよびSemantic Scholarで27件のシステマティックレビューに対して自動引用検索をシミュレートした。
- パフォーマンス指標には、再現率、精度、F1-F3スコアが含まれ、元のレビュー検索戦略と比較された。
- 分析された要因には、研究分野、記事数、シード記事の特性、APIの選択が含まれる。
主要な成果:
- 自動引用検索は、標準的な戦略と比較して、精度(p < 0.05)およびF1スコア(p < 0.05)で優れていた。
- 再現率(p < 0.05)およびF3スコア(p < 0.05)は、標準的な戦略よりも優れてはいなかった。
- パフォーマンスは研究分野によって異なり、社会政策よりも環境管理の方がパフォーマンスが高かった。
結論:
- 自動引用検索は、再現率よりも精度が優先される場合に補助的な戦略として使用するのが最適である。
- その優れた精度とF1スコアは、特定のシステマティックレビューの文脈での有用性を示唆している。
- 再現率とF3スコアの低さは、包括的な検索が最重要視される場合の限界を示している。
関連する概念動画
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.3K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K


