関連する実験動画
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
症状性静脈結紮の治療における再開通および再建術の技術と転帰
Andrew Woerner1, Mayura P Umapathy2, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick1
1Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Purpose:
To report techniques, adverse events, and outcomes of endovascular recanalization and stent reconstruction for symptomatic venous ligation.
Materials And Methods:
In this single-center, retrospective study, nine patients (mean age, 52.9), underwent endovenous recanalization and stent reconstruction for symptomatic venous ligation between January 2014 and January 2024. Patients presented with CEAP 3 (55.6%), 4 (11.1%), and 5 (33.3%) disease. Ligation sites commonly involved the external iliac (66.7%) or femoral veins (44.4%); five patients had multisegment ligation. Etiologies included surgical injury (44.4%), trauma (22.2%), chronic venous thrombosis (22.2%), and malignant resection (11.1%). Procedural techniques, recanalization methods, stent selection, adverse events, patency, and clinical outcomes were recorded.
Results:
Primary single-session recanalization was achieved in nine patients (100%). Ten procedures were performed, as one patient required reintervention for early thrombosis. Sharp extravascular techniques were required in six procedures (60%). Twenty-six stents were deployed (Wallstents, cTAG devices, SMART stents), with a mean of 2.9 ± 2.5 stents per patient and mean stent diameter of 15.5 ± 3.2 mm. One patient (11.1%) developed early stent occlusion and was unable to be recanalized. All other reconstructions remained patent (primary/secondary patency 88.9%). Mean imaging follow-up was 466.4 ± 500.3 days, and mean clinical follow-up was 1,086.2 ± 717.5 days. Adverse events included one major (10.0%; SIR class D) and one minor (10.0%; SIR class A). Clinical improvement occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including complete symptom resolution in six (66.7%). No mortality occurred.
Conclusion:
Endovenous recanalization and reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic venous ligation.
さらに関連する動画
03:06Combination of High Ligation and Intraoperative Embolization using Polidocanol for Treatment of Varicoceles
Published on: December 22, 2023
06:02Anatomical Reconstructions of the Human Cardiac Venous System using Contrast-computed Tomography of Perfusion-fixed Specimens
Published on: April 18, 2013
関連する概念動画
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation