血液がんにおけるマクロファージ極性化:メカニズムと治療戦略
Zhi-Gang Chen1,2, Huan Yang1,2, Chao Yang1
1Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Abstract:
Leukemia treatment faces persistent challenges, including chemotherapy resistance and relapse, highlighting macrophage polarization in the tumor microenvironment (TME) as a therapeutic target. Macrophages dynamically shift between antitumor M1 and protumor M2 phenotypes, with M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) dominating leukemia TMEs. These cells secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, fostering immune evasion, angiogenesis, and leukemia stem cell (LSC) survival. In AML, M2 TAMs correlate with poor prognosis and chemoresistance via CSF-1/IL-10 signaling. Polarization is regulated by transcription factors (STAT6, PPARγ, KLF4), hypoxia, and metabolic reprogramming. Therapeutic strategies focus on: (1) M2 depletion (anti-CD163/CD206 antibodies); (2) Pathway inhibition (CCL2/CCR2 or IL-4/STAT6 blockade); (3) Metabolic modulation (glycolysis/OXPHOS targeting); and (4) Phagocytosis enhancement (CD47-SIRPα blockade, HDAC6 inhibition). Preclinical studies demonstrate CSF-1R inhibitors (e.g., pexidartinib) disrupt LSC-TAM crosstalk, while CAR-M therapy synergizes with phagocytosis-promoting agents. Despite challenges, macrophage-targeted therapies offer transformative potential by remodeling the TME, overcoming resistance, and augmenting immunotherapy. This review outlines mechanistic insights and translational strategies to harness macrophage plasticity for leukemia treatment.
関連する概念動画
Group Polarization
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Molecular Shape and Polarity
Polar Coordinates
Polarity of the Cytoskeleton


