法人類類学における尤度比計算の誤った数式:Scott & Rogers(2026)へのコメント
1Forensic Data Science Laboratory, Aston University, Birmingham, UK; Forensic Evaluation Ltd, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract:
Scott & Rogers (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112673 promotes the use of the likelihood-ratio framework in forensic anthropology. This is welcome. Unfortunately, Scott & Rogers (2026) uses an incorrect formula for the calculation of likelihood ratios. This incorrect formula did not originate in Scott & Rogers (2026). It has, for some time, been used in the forensic anthropology literature; an earlier occurrence appears in Steadman et al. (2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20393. Scott & Rogers (2026) also uses confusing language and mathematical notation that are non-standard compared to the norms of the forensic-inference-and-statistics literature. This letter to the editor is offered in the hope that it will help prevent repetition of these problems.
関連する概念動画
Chemical Formulas
Experimental Determination of Chemical Formula
Molecular Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Ionic Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Calculating Equilibrium Concentrations
A more...
Formula Mass and Mole Concepts of Compounds


